The Alternative Approach to the Lumbosacral Segment: The Right-Sided Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Szabo, Viktor [1 ]
Berta, Balazs [1 ]
Nagy, Mate [1 ]
Kulcsar, Dominik [1 ]
Perlaki, Gabor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schwarcz, Attila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Pecs, Hungary
[2] Univ Pecs, Ctr Neurosc, HUN REN PTE Clin Neurosc MR Res Grp, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Pecs, Hungary
关键词
ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbosacral; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Right-sided OLIF; VASCULAR ANATOMY; ILIAC VEIN; SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; L5-S1;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123823
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (ALIF+D) is a well-described technique treating lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Mobilizing the common iliac arteries and veins during the ALIF+D approach may increase the risk of bleeding when the bifurcations are low. This study demonstrates that in such cases, the right-sided oblique lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF+D) offers a novel alternative to the ALIF+D approach. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were operated on with the ALIF+D approach, and 20 patients were operated on using the right-sided OLIF+D technique. Computed tomography-based imaging and clinical data, such as patient-reported outcomes, were collected. RESULTS: Both ALIF+D and OLIF+D surgeries elicited a statistically significant decrease (P 5 0.001) between the preoperative and postoperative Oswestry disability index and the back and leg pain visual analog scale scores. A significant increase was observed in both techniques between preoperative and postoperative anterior segmental height, posterior segmental height, and segmental lordosis (P 5 0.001). There were no statistically significant postoperative differences between patients operated by ALIF+D and patients operated by OLIF+D in the segmental lordosis angle (P = 0.354), anterior segmental height (P = 0.297), posterior segmental height (P = 0.404), Oswestry disability index (P = 0.824), or back and leg visual analog scale scores (P = 0.682 and P = 0.979, respectively). The OLIF+D group showed trend-like higher blood loss (198 +/- 118 mL vs. 134 +/- 77 mL; P = 0.058) and significantly longer surgical time (199 +/- 47 vs. 169 +/- 54 minutes; P = 0.009) compared to the ALIF+D group. CONCLUSIONS: The right-sided lumbosacral OLIF+D approach is an alternative to the ALIF+D approach if the latter is hazardous due to vessel anatomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Dugan, Robert K.
    White, Michael D.
    Walker, Corey T.
    O'Neill, Luke K.
    Alan, Nima
    Zhou, James J.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (06) : 785 - 792
  • [3] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266
  • [4] Comparison of Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology between Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Treatments for Lumbosacral Junction
    Wu, Po-Kuan
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 7 (04) : 855 - 865
  • [5] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [6] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Richter, M.
    Weidenfeld, M.
    Uckmann, F. P.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [7] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Thayaparan, Ganesha K.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 29 (05) : 705 - 711
  • [8] Supine anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus lateral position oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: A comparison of two approaches to the lumbosacral junction
    Xi, Zhuo
    Burch, Shane
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Chang, Chih-Chang
    Ruan, Huibing
    Eichler, Charles
    Chou, Dean
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 82 : 134 - 140
  • [9] Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Li, Renjie
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhou, Hong
    Jiang, Weimin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 355 - 365
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125