Comparison of Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma and Lobular Carcinoma: An Observational Study

被引:0
|
作者
Ucar, Mahmut [1 ]
Yilmaz, Mukaddes [1 ]
Erdis, Eda [2 ]
Yucel, Birsen [2 ]
机构
[1] Sivas Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Med Oncol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkiye
[2] Sivas Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkiye
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2025年 / 61卷 / 02期
关键词
breast cancer; mixed ductolobular carcinoma; invasive lobular carcinoma; BREAST-CANCER; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/medicina61020310
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Mixed ductolobular carcinomas (mDLCs) are tumors that contain both ductal and lobular components. The clinicopathological characteristics and impacts on survival of the two components, which have distinct biological behaviors, are still not clearly understood. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence/metastasis patterns, and survival outcomes of mDLC and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), as well as to investigate the prognostic significance of both histopathologies. Materials and Methods: The outcomes of 132 patients who were followed and treated between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed. Patients were examined in two groups, ILC and mDLC. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the baseline clinicopathological characteristics and treatments. Survival rates were subsequently analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In this study, 80 (61%) patients had ILC histopathology, while 52 (39%) had mDLC histopathology. Differences between the groups were observed in median age (p = 0.038), N stage (p = 0.046), estrogen receptor (ER) status (p = 0.005), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.007), median tumor diameter (p = 0.050), and frequency of distant metastasis (p = 0.029). The treatments, relapse patterns, and metastasis patterns were similar (p > 0.05). No differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were observed. In the multivariate analysis, mDLC histopathology was identified as a poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.95, CI 95%: 1.10-7.88, p = 0.030). Histopathology (ILC vs. mDCL) was not identified as a prognostic factor in the Cox regression analysis for DFS. Conclusion: Although mDLC has poor clinicopathological features (younger age, more advanced N stage, more ER negativity, more lymphovascular invasion, and more frequency of metastases) and appears more aggressive than ILC, these changes do not affect survival in this study. However, mDLC histopathology seems to be associated with poor prognosis for OS.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expression of Sarcosine Metabolism-Related Proteins in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Comparison to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
    Cha, Yoon Jin
    Jung, Woo Hee
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Koo, Ja Seung
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (03) : 598 - 607
  • [22] New therapeutic approaches for invasive lobular carcinoma
    Hwang E.S.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2014, 6 (3) : 159 - 168
  • [23] Clinicopathological Characteristics of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast
    Hanagiri, Takeshi
    Nozoe, Tadahiro
    Mizukami, Makiko
    Ichiki, Yoshinobu
    Sugaya, Masakazu
    Yasuda, Manabu
    Takenoyama, Mitsuhiro
    Sugio, Kenji
    Yasumoto, Kosei
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 32 (02) : 76 - 80
  • [24] Intratumoral androgen metabolism and actions in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast
    Yoda, Tomomi
    McNamara, Keely May
    Miki, Yasuhiro
    Takagi, Mayu
    Rai, Yoshiaki
    Ohi, Yasuyo
    Sagara, Yasuaki
    Tamaki, Kentaro
    Hirakawa, Hisashi
    Ishida, Takanori
    Suzuki, Takashi
    Ohuchi, Noriaki
    Sasano, Hironobu
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2014, 105 (11) : 1503 - 1509
  • [25] Comparison of MRI Features of Invasive Pleomorphic and Classical Lobular Carcinoma: Differentiation Is Possible?
    Yilmaz, Temel Fatih
    Otcu, Hafize
    Sari, Lutfullah
    Gucin, Zuhal
    Gultekin, Mehmet Ali
    Yabul, Fatma Celik
    Toprak, Huseyin
    Yildiz, Seyma
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (SUPPL 3) : 722 - 727
  • [26] A comparison of the imaging features of pleomorphic and classical invasive lobular carcinoma
    Yeap, Phey Ming
    Evans, Andrew
    Purdie, Colin A.
    Jordan, Lee B.
    Vinnicombe, Sarah J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 172 (02) : 381 - 389
  • [27] Comparison of MRI Features of Invasive Pleomorphic and Classical Lobular Carcinoma: Differentiation Is Possible?
    Temel Fatih Yilmaz
    Hafize Otcu
    Lutfullah Sari
    Zuhal Gucin
    Mehmet Ali Gultekin
    Fatma Celik Yabul
    Huseyin Toprak
    Seyma Yildiz
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84 : 722 - 727
  • [28] Invasive lobular carcinoma: clinicopathological features and subtypes
    Danzinger, Sabine
    Hielscher, Nora
    Izso, Miriam
    Metzler, Johanna
    Trinkl, Carmen
    Pfeifer, Christian
    Tendl-Schulz, Kristina
    Singer, Christian F.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (06)
  • [29] Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma
    Mouabbi, Jason A.
    Raghavendra, Akshara Singareeka
    Bassett Jr, Roland L.
    Christgen, Matthias
    Middleton, Lavinia
    Teshome, Mediget
    Nasrazadani, Azadeh
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel
    Hassan, Amy
    Tripathy, Debasish
    Layman, Rachel M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 191
  • [30] Lobular invasive carcinoma of the breast is a molecular entity distinct from luminal invasive ductal carcinoma
    Gruel, Nadege
    Lucchesi, Carlo
    Raynal, Virginie
    Rodrigues, Manuel J.
    Pierron, Gaelle
    Goudefroye, Remi
    Cottu, Paul
    Reyal, Fabien
    Sastre-Garau, Xavier
    Fourquet, Alain
    Delattre, Olivier
    Vincent-Salomon, Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (13) : 2399 - 2407