Causal relationships between obesity-related anthropometric indicators and sepsis risk: a Mendelian-randomization study

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Chuchu [1 ]
Ren, Jiajia [1 ]
Xu, Xi [1 ]
Lei, Hua [1 ]
Deng, Guorong [1 ]
Liu, Jueheng [1 ]
Gao, Xiaoming [1 ]
Li, Jiamei [1 ]
Wang, Xiaochuang [1 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Crit Care Med, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Surg Crit Care & Life Support, Minist Educ, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
anthropometric indicator; inflammation; Mendelian randomization; obesity; sepsis; INFLAMMATION; POPULATION; MORTALITY; DISEASE; MUSCLE; BIAS; MASS;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2024.1433754
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have reported an association between obesity and risk of sepsis. However, the results have been inconsistent, and no causal inference can be drawn from them. Therefore, we conducted a Mendelian-randomization (MR) study to investigate causal relationships between available obesity-related anthropometric indicators and sepsis risk. Methods: We performed MR analyses using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics on 14 anthropometric indicators [namely body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences (WC, HC), basal metabolic rate (BMR), whole-body fat mass (WBFM), trunk fat mass (TFM), leg fat mass (LFM), arm fat mass (AFM), body fat percentage (BFP), whole-body fat-free mass (WBFFM), trunk fat-free mass (TFFM), leg fat-free mass (LFFM), arm fat-free mass (AFFM), and whole-body water mass (WBWM)], sepsis, critical care sepsis, and 28-day death due to sepsis from the UK Biobank and FinnGen cohort. The primary method of MR analysis was inverse variance-weighted average method. Sensitivity analyses, including heterogeneity and horizontal-pleiotropy tests, were conducted to assess the stability of the MR results. Additionally, we applied multiple-variable MR (MVMR) to evaluate the effect of BMI on the relationship between each anthropometric indicator and sepsis risk. Results: Our MR analysis demonstrated causal relationships between 14 anthropometric indicators and sepsis of different severities. After we adjusted for BMI, MVMR analyses indicated that WC, BMR, LFM, WBFFM, TFFM, AFFM, and WBWM remained significantly associated with the presence of sepsis (all p < 0.05). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability of our MR results, and no significant horizontal pleiotropy was detected. Conclusion: This MR study revealed that increases in obesity-related anthropometric indicators had causal associations with a higher risk of sepsis, which might provide important insights for the identification of individuals at risk for sepsis in community and hospital settings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022
[2]   Nontraditional Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanistic, Research, and Clinical Considerations for Youth A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association [J].
Balagopal, Prabhakaran ;
de Ferranti, Sarah D. ;
Cook, Stephen ;
Daniels, Stephen R. ;
Gidding, Samuel S. ;
Hayman, Laura L. ;
McCrindle, Brian W. ;
Mietus-Snyder, Michele L. ;
Steinberger, Julia .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (23) :2749-2769
[3]   Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Haycock, Philip C. ;
Burgess, Stephen .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) :304-314
[4]   Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Burgess, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) :512-525
[5]   Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments [J].
Burgess, Stephen ;
Thompson, Simon G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (11) :1312-1323
[6]   Central Obesity and Survival in Subjects With Coronary Artery Disease A Systematic Review of the Literature and Collaborative Analysis With Individual Subject Data [J].
Coutinho, Thais ;
Goel, Kashish ;
de Sa, Daniel Correa ;
Kragelund, Charlotte ;
Kanaya, Alka M. ;
Zeller, Marianne ;
Park, Jong-Seon ;
Kober, Lars ;
Torp-Pedersen, Christian ;
Cottin, Yves ;
Lorgis, Luc ;
Lee, Sang-Hee ;
Kim, Young-Jo ;
Thomas, Randal ;
Roger, Veronique L. ;
Somers, Virend K. ;
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (19) :1877-1886
[7]   Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies [J].
Davey Smith, George ;
Hemani, Gibran .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2014, 23 :R89-R98
[8]   Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians [J].
Davies, Neil M. ;
Holmes, Michael V. ;
Smith, George Davey .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 362
[9]   Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021 [J].
Evans, Laura ;
Rhodes, Andrew ;
Alhazzani, Waleed ;
Antonelli, Massimo ;
Coopersmith, Craig M. ;
French, Craig ;
Machado, Flavia R. ;
Mcintyre, Lauralyn ;
Ostermann, Marlies ;
Prescott, Hallie C. ;
Schorr, Christa ;
Simpson, Steven ;
Wiersinga, W. Joost ;
Alshamsi, Fayez ;
Angus, Derek C. ;
Arabi, Yaseen ;
Azevedo, Luciano ;
Beale, Richard ;
Beilman, Gregory ;
Belley-Cote, Emilie ;
Burry, Lisa ;
Cecconi, Maurizio ;
Centofanti, John ;
Coz Yataco, Angel ;
De Waele, Jan ;
Dellinger, R. Phillip ;
Doi, Kent ;
Du, Bin ;
Estenssoro, Elisa ;
Ferrer, Ricard ;
Gomersall, Charles ;
Hodgson, Carol ;
Hylander Moller, Morten ;
Iwashyna, Theodore ;
Jacob, Shevin ;
Kleinpell, Ruth ;
Klompas, Michael ;
Koh, Younsuck ;
Kumar, Anand ;
Kwizera, Arthur ;
Lobo, Suzana ;
Masur, Henry ;
McGloughlin, Steven ;
Mehta, Sangeeta ;
Mehta, Yatin ;
Mer, Mervyn ;
Nunnally, Mark ;
Oczkowski, Simon ;
Osborn, Tiffany ;
Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (11) :E1063-E1143
[10]   Mendelian randomization studies: using naturally randomized genetic data to fill evidence gaps [J].
Ference, Brian A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) :566-571