Blue sky through intellectual property protection: quasi-experimental evidence from China's Intellectual Property City Program

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Hua [1 ]
Chen, Zhaoyu [1 ]
Li, Xinyan [2 ]
Zhao, Xin [3 ,4 ]
Vasa, Laszlo [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
[4] Szecheny Istvan Univ, Fac Econ, Gyor, Hungary
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Haze pollution; Intellectual property protection; Green innovation effect; Resource allocation effect; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; HAZE POLLUTION; RIGHTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-05465-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A well-developed intellectual property system is an important backbone for green innovation and technology, which are widely regarded as crucial tools to combat haze pollution and achieve blue sky. Despite China's aggressive launch of the Intellectual Property City Program (IPCP) since 2012 to improve its intellectual property system, there is little evidence on whether and how IPCP affects haze pollution. Compiling a panel dataset of Chinese cities, we employ a difference-in-differences estimator to identify the causal impact of IPCP on haze pollution. We find that IPCP can effectively reduce haze pollution in IPCP cities compared to non-IPCP cities after the IPCP launch. Our instrumented results using ancient academies further support the haze-abatement effect of IPCP. Mechanism tests reveal that this reduction is driven by green innovation effect and resource allocation effect. The effect is pronounced in eastern cities and cities with high degrees of green innovation, marketization and environmental regulation intensity. Our findings provide support for the critical role of powerful IP protection in haze pollution control.
引用
收藏
页数:46
相关论文
共 117 条
[31]   The effect of low emission zones on air pollution and infant health [J].
Gehrsitz, Markus .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 83 :121-144
[32]   Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study [J].
Ginarte, JC ;
Park, WG .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (03) :283-301
[33]   Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment [J].
Glass, AJ ;
Saggi, K .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 56 (02) :387-410
[34]   How does international technology spillover affect China's carbon emissions? A new perspective through intellectual property protection [J].
Hao, Yu ;
Ba, Ning ;
Ren, Siyu ;
Wu, Haitao .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 25 :577-590
[35]   Influence of national intellectual property demonstration enterprise policy on urban green innovation: evidence from China [J].
He, Yu ;
Tian, Jiexin ;
Chen, Zhenzhen ;
Qin, Zhaohui ;
Andrianarimanana, Mihasina Harinaivo .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (01) :1499-1518
[36]   The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China?s carbon emissions trading pilot [J].
Hong, Qianqian ;
Cui, Linhao ;
Hong, Penghui .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 110
[37]   Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights [J].
Horii, Ryo ;
Iwaisako, Tatsuro .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 90 (01) :45-85
[38]   Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China [J].
Hu, Yucai ;
Ren, Shenggang ;
Wang, Yangjie ;
Chen, Xiaohong .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85
[39]   Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment-evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J].
Huang, Jingchang ;
Zhao, Jing ;
Cao, June .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 72 :154-174
[40]   The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis [J].
Jalil, Abdul ;
Feridun, Mete .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (02) :284-291