A comparative analysis of image harmonization techniques in mitigating differences in CT acquisition and reconstruction

被引:0
作者
Yadav, Anil [1 ,2 ]
Welland, Spencer [3 ]
Hoffman, John M. [3 ]
Kim, Grace [3 ]
Brown, Matthew S. [3 ]
Prosper, Ashley E. [2 ]
Aberle, Denise R. [1 ,2 ]
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. [3 ]
Hsu, William [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Samueli Sch Engn, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA, Dept Radiol Sci, Med & Imaging Informat Grp, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] UCLA, Ctr Comp Vis & Imaging Biomarkers, Dept Radiol Sci, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Computed Tomography; Image Reconstruction; Harmonization; Convolutional Neural Network; Generative Adversarial Network; DEEP FEATURES; RADIOMICS; RADIOGENOMICS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/adabad
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. The study aims to systematically characterize the effect of CT parameter variations on images and lung radiomic and deep features, and to evaluate the ability of different image harmonization methods to mitigate the observed variations. Approach. A retrospective in-house sinogram dataset of 100 low-dose chest CT scans was reconstructed by varying radiation dose (100%, 25%, 10%) and reconstruction kernels (smooth, medium, sharp). A set of image processing, convolutional neural network (CNNs), and generative adversarial network-based (GANs) methods were trained to harmonize all image conditions to a reference condition (100% dose, medium kernel). Harmonized scans were evaluated for image similarity using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS), and for the reproducibility of radiomic and deep features using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Main Results. CNNs consistently yielded higher image similarity metrics amongst others; for Sharp/10%, which exhibited the poorest visual similarity, PSNR increased from a mean +/- CI of 17.763 +/- 0.492 to 31.925 +/- 0.571, SSIM from 0.219 +/- 0.009 to 0.754 +/- 0.017, and LPIPS decreased from 0.490 +/- 0.005 to 0.275 +/- 0.016. Texture-based radiomic features exhibited a greater degree of variability across conditions, i.e. a CCC of 0.500 +/- 0.332, compared to intensity-based features (0.972 +/- 0.045). GANs achieved the highest CCC (0.969 +/- 0.009 for radiomic and 0.841 +/- 0.070 for deep features) amongst others. CNNs are suitable if downstream applications necessitate visual interpretation of images, whereas GANs are better alternatives for generating reproducible quantitative image features needed for machine learning applications. Significance. Understanding the efficacy of harmonization in addressing multi-parameter variability is crucial for optimizing diagnostic accuracy and a critical step toward building generalizable models suitable for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios
    Leijenaar, Ralph T. H.
    Parmar, Chintan
    Grossmann, Patrick
    Cavalho, Sara
    Bussink, Johan
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
    Rietveld, Derek
    Hoebers, Frank
    Rietbergen, Michelle M.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Dekker, Andre
    Quackenbush, John
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Lambin, Philippe
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, LUNG CANCER SCREENING CT
  • [3] Arjovsky M, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
  • [4] Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers
    Barnhart, HX
    Haber, M
    Song, JL
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (04) : 1020 - 1027
  • [5] Chen H., 2021, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, V40, P1231, DOI [10.1109/TMI.2021.3136553, DOI 10.1109/TMI.2021.3136553]
  • [6] Survival prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: multimodal PET/CT deep features radiomic model utilizing automated machine learning
    Chen, Jianxin
    Lin, Fengyi
    Dai, Zhaoyan
    Chen, Yu
    Fan, Yawen
    Li, Ang
    Zhao, Chenyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 150 (10)
  • [7] Not-so-supervised: A survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis
    Cheplygina, Veronika
    de Bruijne, Marleen
    Pluim, Josien P. W.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2019, 54 : 280 - 296
  • [8] Deep Learning-based Image Conversion of CT Reconstruction Kernels Improves Radiomics Reproducibility for Pulmonary Nodules or Masses
    Choe, Jooae
    Lee, Sang Min
    Do, Kyung-Hymn
    Lee, Gaeun
    Lee, June-Goo
    Seo, Joon Beom
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) : 365 - 373
  • [9] Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
    Dabov, Kostadin
    Foi, Alessandro
    Katkovnik, Vladimir
    Egiazarian, Karen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 16 (08) : 2080 - 2095
  • [10] The Effects of Variations in Parameters and Algorithm Choices on Calculated Radiomics Feature Values: Initial investigations and comparisons to feature variability across CT image acquisition conditions
    Emaminejad, Nastaran
    Wahi-Anwar, Muhammad
    Hoffman, John
    Kim, Grace H.
    Brown, Matthew S.
    McNitt-Gray, Michael
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 10575