'We feel like we're making a significant impact': teachers' subjective task value in sex and sexuality education

被引:0
作者
Mike, Koby [1 ]
Hartal, Gilly [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Gender Studies, Ramat Gan, Israel
来源
SEX EDUCATION-SEXUALITY SOCIETY AND LEARNING | 2025年
关键词
Sex education; sexuality education; teachers; motivation; barriers; situated expectancy-value theory; EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY; MOTIVATION; MESSAGES;
D O I
10.1080/14681811.2025.2466165
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Sexuality education is necessary for promoting healthy sexual relationships. Accordingly, it is being integrated into school curricula in many countries. Teachers and educators are expected to teach sexuality education in their classrooms, but often face personal, social, professional, and organisational difficulties. Several programmes have been developed to mitigate these challenges, but their success is limited. In this paper, we utilise situated expectancy-value theory to analyse the expectancy-for-success and subjective-task-value of sexuality education. According to situated expectancy-value theory, subjective-task-value is the main predictor of choice to participate in or avoid tasks, and therefore we argue that to increase the provision of sexuality education in the school system, it is not enough to lower barriers, it is also essential to enhance teachers' willingness to teach sexuality education. In this study, we interviewed 23 teachers regarding their perceptions of value in teaching sexuality education. Findings reveal new insights into the personal and professional value teachers see in sexuality education, including personal interest; self-development; the desire to build trust and strengthen connections with students; and a sense of imparting essential information. These factors can be utilised to better design initial and continuing education for sexuality education teachers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
Mullis M.D., Kastrinos A., Wollney E., Taylor G., Bylund C.L., International Barriers to Parent-Child Communication About Sexual and Reproductive Health Topics: A Qualitative Systematic Review, Sex Education, 21, 4, pp. 387-403, (2021)
[32]  
Nadan Y., Roer-Strier D., A Context-Informed Approach to the Study of Child Risk and Protection: Lessons Learned and Future Directions, Context-Informed Perspectives of Child Risk and Protection in Israel, 10, pp. 317-331, (2020)
[33]  
Neves de Jesus S., Lens W., An Integrated Model for the Study of Teacher Motivation, Applied Psychology, 54, 1, pp. 119-134, (2005)
[34]  
Norozi S.A., Moen T., Childhood as a Social Construction, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6, 2, pp. 75-80, (2016)
[35]  
Nufar N., Training Teachers for Sexuality Education, (2021)
[36]  
Onn L., Avidan I., Evaluation of Motivation for Teaching Sex Education Among Students, Rav Gvanim, 24, 1, pp. 251-282, (2023)
[37]  
Rogers E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, (1962)
[38]  
Round M., “The Professional Side of It”: Exploring Discomfort in Delivering RSE in an Independent Boarding School in England, Sex Education, 24, 4, pp. 515-530, (2023)
[39]  
Shtarkshall R.A., Santelli J.S., Hirsch J.S., Sex Education and Sexual Socialization: Roles for Educators and Parents, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 2, pp. 116-119, (2007)
[40]  
Shuib N.B., Bin Mohd Yasin M.H., Bin Tahar M.M., The Relationship Between Teachers’ Knowledge, Practices, Vision, Attitudes and Commitment in Teaching Sexuality Education for Students with Intellectual Disability, Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6, 3, pp. 4942-4958, (2022)