Spray volume optimization with UAV-based herbicide application for effective droplet deposition and weed control in direct-seeded rice

被引:1
作者
Paul, Ratchagar Arockia Infant [1 ,2 ]
Palanisamy, Murali Arthanari [1 ]
Peramaiyan, Panneerselvam [2 ]
Kumar, Virender [3 ]
Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar [4 ]
Gurjar, Bholuram [5 ]
Vijayakumar, Shanmugam [3 ]
Djanaguiraman, Maduraimuthu [6 ]
Pazhanivelan, Sellaperumal [7 ]
Ramasamy, Kavitha [8 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Dept Agron, Coimbatore, India
[2] South Asia Reg Ctr, Int Rice Res Inst, Varanasi, India
[3] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos, Philippines
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX USA
[6] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Dept Crop Physiol, Coimbatore, India
[7] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Ctr Water & Geospatial Studies, Coimbatore, India
[8] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Dept Farm Machinery & Power Engn, Coimbatore, India
来源
FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
drone; direct-seeded rice (DSR); flat fan nozzle; knapsack manual sprayer (KMS); remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS); MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; SIZE; COMPETITION; PARAMETERS; YIELD; FIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fagro.2024.1491842
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) represent a cutting-edge technology that holds the promise of revolutionizing the conventional tasks carried out in the realm of agriculture. On a global scale, UAVs are gaining prominence for pesticide applications, particularly with a focus on utilizing low spray volumes. Nevertheless, there remains a notable gap in research concerning the impacts of employing low spray volumes on herbicide efficacy. Hence, multi-location field studies were conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar and Wetland Station, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India in 2022 to evaluate the impact of different spray volumes using UAV and Knapsack Manual Sprayer (KMS) on droplet deposition, droplet density, and weed control efficacy. The treatments included UAV sprays at 30 and 45 L ha-1, as well as KMS at 500 L ha-1, with a weedy check as a control. Bispyribac-sodium 10% SC was applied at a rate of 35 g a.i ha-1 during the 2-to 3-leaf stage of the crops. The results revealed that droplet deposition, area coverage, and volume median diameter were affected by sprayer type (UAV and KMS). However, the two spray volumes tested using the UAV method provided similar droplet parameters. The KMS system at 500 L ha-1 exhibited the highest droplet deposition, while the UAV system achieved better droplet distribution at a spray volume of 30 L ha-1. Remarkably, the UAV system at 30 L ha-1 demonstrated effective weed control, which was statistically comparable to the KMS system at 500 L ha-1. These findings emphasize that the UAV spraying system with a spray volume of 30 L ha-1, delivering effective weed control while utilizing less carrier volume compared to the manual knapsack spraying method. Thus, the UAV spray system has great potential as a viable alternative to manual knapsack spraying for herbicide application in direct-seeded rice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Chemical weed control in direct-seeded rice using drone and mist flow spray technology
    Abd Ghani, Muhd Azlan
    Juraimi, Abdul Shukor
    Su, Ahmad Suhaizi Mat
    Ahmad-Hamdani, Muhammad Saiful
    Islam, A. K. M. Mominul
    Motmainna, Mst
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2024, 184
  • [2] INITIAL BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES OF APHIS-GOSSYPII TO DEFINED DEPOSITS OF BIFENTHRIN ON CHRYSANTHEMUM
    ADAMS, AJ
    HALL, FR
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 1990, 9 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [3] Ahirwar S., 2019, INT J CURR MICROBIOL, V8, P2500, DOI DOI 10.20546/IJCMAS.2019.801.264
  • [4] Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application
    Ahmad, Fiaz
    Qiu, Baijing
    Dong, Xiaoya
    Ma, Jing
    Huang, Xin
    Ahmed, Shibbir
    Chandio, Farman Ali
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 172
  • [5] Arthanari P. M., 2022, Technological glimpses on weeds and their management, P79
  • [6] Saving of water and labor in a rice-wheat system with no-tillage and direct seeding technologies
    Bhushan, Lav
    Ladha, Jagdish K.
    Gupta, Raj K.
    Singh, S.
    Tirol-Padre, A.
    Saharawat, Ys.
    Gathala, M.
    Pathak, H.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (05) : 1288 - 1296
  • [7] BOUSE LF, 1992, T ASAE, V35, P51, DOI 10.13031/2013.28569
  • [8] Visual Determination of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Exposure Using Allura Red As an Environmentally Friendly Pesticide Surrogate
    Cao, Lidong
    Cao, Chong
    Wang, Ying
    Li, Xiuhuan
    Zhou, Zhaolu
    Li, Fengmin
    Yan, Xiaojing
    Huang, Qiliang
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (05): : 3882 - 3889
  • [9] Agronomic and Environmental Determinants of Direct Seeded Rice in South Asia
    Chaudhary A.
    Venkatramanan V.
    Kumar Mishra A.
    Sharma S.
    [J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (1): : 253 - 290
  • [10] Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice
    Chauhan, B. S.
    Johnson, D. E.
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2011, 30 (11) : 1385 - 1391