Surging currents: a systematic review of the literature on dynamic stakeholder engagements in higher education in the generative artificial intelligence era

被引:3
作者
Yang, Jiaxi [1 ]
Qiu, Han [1 ]
Yu, Wenxuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Chengzhi Bldg, 422, Siming South Rd, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Generative artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; higher education; stakeholders; CHATGPT;
D O I
10.1080/17516234.2024.2429046
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
As Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) rapidly integrates into higher education, a critical question arises: should we focus on the technology's potential or the essential role of stakeholders? While GAI offers transformative possibilities, its success hinges on students, educators, administrators, and policymakers. This study examines the structure of these stakeholders and the patterns of relationships between them. Utilizing a systematic literature review, we screened 224 studies and selected 38 key articles to construct a hierarchical framework illustrating the complex interactions among stakeholders. The research reveals the prominence of educators, students, and administrators while reflecting the increasing attention to technology vendors and government agencies. Interactions among stakeholders primarily fall into four patterns: cooperation, control and guidance, support and dependency, as well as competition and conflict. Although existing research extensively discusses GAI's potential, this study argues that in-depth analyses of stakeholder roles and relationships are lacking, particularly given real-world complexities. Future research should explore these multidimensional relationships to promote responsible and effective GAI use in education.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 310
页数:29
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions [J].
Abulibdeh, Ammar ;
Zaidan, Esmat ;
Abulibdeh, Rawan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 437
[2]  
Acosta-Enriquez BG, 2024, Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, V7, P100320, DOI [10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320, 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320, DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100320]
[3]  
Adetayo AJ, 2023, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, V27, P131, DOI [10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681, 10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681, DOI 10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681, https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681]
[4]   The impact of generative AI tools on researchers and research: Implications for academia in higher education [J].
Al-Zahrani, Abdulrahman M. .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 61 (05) :1029-1043
[5]   The effect of chatbots on learning: a meta-analysis of empirical research [J].
Alemdag, Ecenaz .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2025, 57 (02) :459-481
[6]  
Amaral A., 2002, GOVERNING HIGHER ED, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7, 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Artificial Intelligence Act
[8]   Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review [J].
Ansari, Aisha Naz ;
Ahmad, Sohail ;
Bhutta, Sadia Muzaffar .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (09) :11281-11321
[9]   Not quite eye to AI: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process [J].
Barrett, Alex ;
Pack, Austin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 20 (01)
[10]   Stakeholders in Higher Education Quality Assurance: Richness in Diversity? [J].
Beerkens, Maarja ;
Udam, Maiki .
HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2017, 30 (03) :341-359