Individual Differences Underlying Preference for Processing Delay in Open-Fit Hearing Aids

被引:0
作者
Susonnudottir, Borgny [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kowalewski, Borys [4 ]
Stiefenhofer, Georg [4 ]
Neher, Tobias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit ORL Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Tech Audiol Sect, Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
[4] WS Audiol AS, Lynge, Denmark
关键词
hearing aids; delay; frequency resolution; comb filter; acoustic coupling; SPEECH; RECOGNITION; NOISE; LIMITS; PATH;
D O I
10.1177/23312165241298613
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In open-fit digital hearing aids (HAs), the processing delay influences comb-filter effects that arise from the interaction of the processed HA sound with the unprocessed direct sound. The current study investigated potential relations between preferred processing delay, spectral and temporal processing abilities, and self-reported listening habits. Ten listeners with normal hearing and 20 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairments participated. Using a HA simulator, delay preference was assessed with a paired-comparison task, three types of stimuli, and five processing delays (0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 ms). Spectral processing was assessed with a spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) task. Temporal processing was assessed with a gap detection task. Self-reported listening habits were assessed using a shortened version of the 'sound preference and hearing habits' questionnaire. A linear mixed-effects model showed a strong effect of processing delay on preference scores (p < .001, eta(2 )= 0.30). Post-hoc comparisons revealed no differences between either the two shortest delays or the three longer delays (all p > .05) but a clear difference between the two sets of delays (p < .001). A multiple linear regression analysis showed SRD to be a significant predictor of delay preference (p < .01, eta(2 )= 0.29), with good spectral processing abilities being associated with a preference for short processing delay. Overall, these results indicate that assessing spectral processing abilities can guide the prescription of open-fit HAs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Agnew J, 2000, J Am Acad Audiol, V11, P330
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, World report on ageing and health
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Hear J, DOI DOI 10.1097/00025572-200002000-00004
[4]   Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure [J].
Bisgaard, Nikolai ;
Vlaming, Marcel S. M. G. ;
Dahlquist, Martin .
TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION, 2010, 14 (02) :113-120
[5]   Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings [J].
Bramslow, Lars .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 (09) :634-644
[6]   Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing [J].
Davies-Venn, Evelyn ;
Nelson, Peggy ;
Souza, Pamela .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 138 (01) :492-503
[7]  
Dillon H., 2012, HEARING AIDS, V2nd
[8]   AUDITORY FILTER CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSONANT RECOGNITION FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS [J].
DUBNO, JR ;
DIRKS, DD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1989, 85 (04) :1666-1675
[9]   THE DETECTION OF TEMPORAL GAPS AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY REGION AND ABSOLUTE NOISE BANDWIDTH [J].
EDDINS, DA ;
HALL, JW ;
GROSE, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (02) :1069-1077
[10]   The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) [J].
Gatehouse, S ;
Noble, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (02) :85-99