E-participation in policy-making for health: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
作者
Esmailzadeh, Hamid [1 ,2 ]
Mafimoradi, Shiva [3 ]
Gholami, Masoumeh [4 ]
Mansourzadeh, Mohammad Javad [5 ]
Rajabi, Fatemeh [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Hlth Informat Management Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Univ Res & Dev Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Minist Hlth & Med Educ, Supreme Council Hlth & Food Secur, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Endocrinol & Metab Clin Sci Inst, Osteoporosis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Community Based Participatory Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Health policy; Social Interaction; Clinical governance; PUBLIC HEALTH; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; IMPACT; LADDER;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080538
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction For the general public, e-participation represents a potential solution to the challenges associated with in-person participation in health policy-making processes. By fostering democratic engagement, e-participation can enhance civic legitimacy and trust in public institutions. However, despite its importance, there is currently a gap in the literature regarding a comprehensive synthesis of studies on various aspects of e-participation in the health policy domain. These aspects include levels of participation, underlying mechanisms, barriers, facilitators, values and outcomes. To address this gap, our proposed scoping review aims to systematically investigate and classify the available literature related to e-participation in policy-making for health.Methods and analysis We will employ the Population, Concept and Context framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Our population of interest will consist of participants involved in policy-making for health, including both government organisers of e-participation and participating citizens (the governed). To identify relevant studies, we will systematically search databases such as CINAHL (EBSCO), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest), Scopus (Elsevier), EMBASE (Elsevier), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Campbell Collaboration, JBI Evidence Synthesis and PubMed using a predefined search strategy. Two independent reviewers will conduct a three-tiered screening process for identified articles, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction will follow a predefined yet flexible form. The results will be summarised in a narrative format, presented either in tabular or diagrammatic form.Ethics and dissemination The National Institute of Health Research of the Islamic Republic of Iran's ethics committee has approved this review study. Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and targeted knowledge-sharing sessions with relevant stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[31]  
Yakobi K., 2020, C E BUS E SERV E SOC