Circular building hubs as intermediate step for the transition towards a circular economy

被引:1
作者
Van Uden, Mart [1 ]
Wamelink, Hans [1 ]
Van Bueren, Ellen [1 ]
Heurkens, Erwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Management Built Environm, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Social practice theory; transitions; circular building hubs; circular economy; reconfiguration; INNOVATION; GOVERNANCE; REGIMES; NICHES; PHASE;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2025.2451618
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite growing government and market interest to use Circular Building Hubs for reusing construction components, few academic articles have been written about them. We know little about the potential of hubs to answer to the challenges of reuse in the present and future, and their potential to drive systemic changes towards a circular economy. Using various qualitative research methods, this article aims to respond to this research gap by applying social practice theory and the multilevel perspective on past and future practice reconfigurations within the system-of-practices in which these hubs reside. Results show that within hubs reconfiguration from demolition to deconstruction and repair and refurbishment practices have been developed. However, selling components remains challenging, and procurement for reuse and design skill remain underdeveloped. Practitioners expect the system-of-practices to professionalize in the coming years, resulting in market growth for secondary components. Long term, practitioners expect hubs to shrink or disappear because the balance between supply and demand will be controlled digitally. Hubs are therefore a driver for the transition, but only as intermediate step, not as solution for a circular economy. This article is particularly interesting for academics studying CE and transitions, and policy makers interested in developing Circular Building Hubs.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 464
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Barriers and enablers of circular economy in construction: a multi-system perspective towards the development of a practical framework [J].
Ababio, Benjamin Kwaku ;
Lu, Weisheng .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (01) :3-21
[2]   Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers [J].
Adams, Katherine Tebbatt ;
Osmani, Mohamed ;
Thorpe, Tony ;
Thornback, Jane .
Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 2017, 170 (01) :15-24
[3]  
Amsterdam, 2019, CIRCULAIRE GEBIEDSON
[4]   From waste to resource management? Construction and demolition waste management through the lens of institutional work [J].
Andersson, Rickard ;
Buser, Martine .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (06) :477-496
[5]  
Bakens W, 2015, INNOV BUILT ENVIR, P149
[6]   Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building [J].
Brown, Halina Szejnwald ;
Vergragt, Philip J. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2008, 75 (01) :107-130
[7]   Enablers and Barriers for Creating a Marketplace for Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Caldera, Savindi ;
Ryley, Tim ;
Zatyko, Nikita .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) :1-19
[8]  
Cb'23, 2023, CB 23
[9]   Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: Why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements [J].
Cherunya, Pauline C. ;
Ahlborg, Helene ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (01)
[10]   A systemic perspective on transition barriers to a circular infrastructure sector [J].
Coenen, Tom B. J. ;
Visscher, Klaasjan ;
Volker, Leentje .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (01) :22-43