The Turkish validity and reliability of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III

被引:0
作者
Parlak, Mumune Merve [1 ]
Munis, Ozlem Bizpinar [2 ]
Kose, Aysen [3 ]
Yildirim, Cansu [4 ]
Ulker, Cemil Arcan [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Speech & Language Therapy, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Etlik City Hosp, Dept Neurol, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Speech & Language Therapy, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Speech & Language Therapy, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Addenbrooke; Alzheimer's disease; cognitive communication disorder; dementia; frontotemporal; mild cognitive impairment; ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS; DIAGNOSTIC GUIDELINES; NATIONAL INSTITUTE; SPANISH VERSION; TEST BATTERY; DEMENTIA; VALIDATION; DISEASE; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.13147
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) was developed as a screening tool for cognitive disorders. Many countries have proven the cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of ACE-III. Aims: To make cultural adaptations of ACE-III for the Turkish population and to examine its validity and reliability. Methods & Procedures: First, ACE-III was translated and adapted into Turkish (ACE-III-TR), then its validity and reliability were examined. The study included 234 people: 93 with dementia (78 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 15 frontotemporal dementia (FTD)), 46 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 95 healthy. Two blinded speech and language therapists rated the ACE-III-TR simultaneously for interrater validity. The same practitioner retested the same participants 2 weeks later for test-retest reliability. The construct validity of the culturally adapted test was assessed by analysing subsection correlations with the ACE-III-TR total score. The association between the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score, relevant subsections and ACE-III-TR total score was examined for criterion validity. Intergroup differences for healthy, MCI and dementia were studied for ACE-III-TR subsections and total score, and cut-off scores were calculated for total score with sensitivity and specificity in differential diagnosis. Results & Outcomes: Attention, memory and ACE-III-TR total scores showed a statistically significant difference between the three groups of dementia, MCI and healthy (p < 0.001). Statistically significant positive correlations ranging from 0.571 to 0.929 were found between ACE-III-TR subsections and total scores (p < 0.05). A highly significant positive correlation was found between MMSE total score and ACE-III-TR total score (r = 0.870). Between the second and first measurements, positive, moderately significant correlations were found for all subsections and ACE-III-TR total (ICC = 0.508-0.784, r = 0.477-0.646). A high level of agreement was found between two raters for all ACE-III-TR subsections and the ACE-III-TR total score (alpha = 0.9296-0.99995). The total ACE-III-TR cut-off score was 79.5 for healthy and MCI and 69.5 for MCI and mild stage dementia. Conclusions & Implications: This study found that ACE-III-TR is a sensitive and specific screening test for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia that has high validity and reliability. ACE-III-TR was found to be a valid and reliable tool in dementia, including AD and FTD, and in mild, moderate and advanced dementia. By providing a more comprehensive assessment of a person's cognitive profile, it can help the clinician make a differential diagnosis of MCI and dementia. ACE-III-TR may be useful in monitoring the progression of cognitive deficits in clinical practice, research studies and therapy follow-up processes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Alpar C., 2016, Spor Salk Ve Eitim Bilimlerinden rneklerle Uygulamali statistik Ve Geerlik Gvenirlik
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V5th ed., DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053]
  • [3] American SpeechLanguageHearing Association (ASHA), 2022, Cognitive communication referral guidelines for adults
  • [4] American SpeechLanguageHearing Association (ASHA), 2023, Dementia (Practice Portal)
  • [5] BonillaSantos J., 2023, Aging Mental Health, V28, P1
  • [6] Frequency of stages of Alzheimer-related lesions in different age categories
    Braak, H
    Braak, E
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 1997, 18 (04) : 351 - 357
  • [7] Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Breton, Alexandre
    Casey, Daniel
    Arnaoutoglou, Nikitas A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 34 (02) : 233 - 242
  • [8] Bruno D, 2020, NEUROLOGIA, V35, P82, DOI [10.1016/j.nrl.2017.06.004, 10.1016/j.nrt.2017.06.004]
  • [9] Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in the diagnosis of dementia: a critical review
    Bruno, Diana
    Schurmann Vignaga, Sofia
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2019, 15 : 441 - 447
  • [10] Accuracy of Dementia Screening Instruments in Emergency Medicine: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    Banerjee, Jay
    Keyes, Daniel
    Eagles, Debra
    Schnitker, Linda
    Bnurs, Mnurs
    Barbic, David
    Fowler, Susan
    LaMantia, Michael A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (02) : 226 - 245