CloudSense: A model for cloud type identification using machine learning CloudSense: A model for cloud type identification using machine learning from radar data from radar data

被引:0
作者
Nizar, Mehzooz [1 ,2 ]
Ambuj, Jha K. [2 ]
Singh, Manmeet [2 ,3 ]
Vaisakh, S. B. [2 ]
Pandithurai, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Univ Sci & Technol, Kochi, India
[2] Minist Earth Sci, Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, Pune, India
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX USA
来源
APPLIED COMPUTING AND GEOSCIENCES | 2024年 / 24卷
关键词
Machine learning; Precipitating clouds; Doppler weather radar; Western ghats; LightGBM; MINORITY OVERSAMPLING TECHNIQUE; STRATIFORM PRECIPITATION; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; RAINDROP SPECTRA; CLASSIFICATION; REFLECTIVITY; VELOCITY; CLUSTERS; SYSTEMS; SMOTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acags.2024.100209
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The knowledge of type of precipitating cloud is crucial for radar based quantitative estimates of precipitation. We propose a novel model called CloudSense which uses machine learning to accurately identify the type of precipitating clouds over the complex terrain locations in the Western Ghats (WG) of India. CloudSense uses vertical reflectivity profiles collected during July-August 2018 from an X-band radar to classify clouds into four categories namely stratiform, mixed stratiform-convective, convective and shallow clouds. The machine learning (ML) model used in CloudSense was trained using a dataset balanced by Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), with features selected based on physical characteristics relevant to different cloud types. Among various ML models evaluated Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) demonstrate superior performance in classifying cloud types with a BAC (Balanced Accuracy) of 0.79 and F1-Score of 0.8. CloudSense generated results are also compared against conventional radar algorithms and we find that CloudSense performs better than radar algorithms. For 200 samples tested, the radar algorithm achieved a BAC of 0.69 and F1-Score of 0.68, whereas CloudSense achieved a BAC of 0.8 and F1-Score of 0.79. Our results show that ML based approach can provide more accurate cloud detection and classification which would be useful to improve precipitation estimates over the complex terrain of the WG.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework [J].
Akiba, Takuya ;
Sano, Shotaro ;
Yanase, Toshihiko ;
Ohta, Takeru ;
Koyama, Masanori .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2623-2631
[2]   A convective/stratiform precipitation classification algorithm for volume scanning weather radar observations [J].
Anagnostou, EN .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 11 (04) :291-300
[3]   Improving quantitative precipitation estimates in mountainous regions by modelling low-level seeder-feeder interactions constrained by Global Precipitation Measurement Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar measurements [J].
Arulraj, Malarvizhi ;
Barros, Ana P. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 231
[4]   Study of Z-R relationship among different topographies in Northern Thailand [J].
Auipong, N. ;
Trivej, P. .
SIAM PHYSICS CONGRESS 2018 (SPC2018): A CREATIVE PATH TO SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION, 2018, 1144
[5]  
Austin P. M., 1972, Journal of Applied Meteorology, V11, P926, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0926:AOTSOP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Barua S, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7063, P735, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24958-7_85
[8]  
Battan L.J., 1973, Radar observation of the atmosphere, V99, P793, DOI [10.1002/qj.49709942229, DOI 10.1002/QJ.49709942229]
[9]  
Biggerstaff MI, 2000, J APPL METEOROL, V39, P2129, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2129:AISFCS>2.0.CO
[10]  
2