Restorative Justice Practices as a Foundation for Medical Education Innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Klasson, Christopher L. [1 ]
Shibli-Rahhal, Amal [2 ]
Ortiz, Eric [1 ]
Raghuram, Ashrita [1 ]
Behel, Jay [3 ]
Gregory, Ada [4 ]
Bernat, Carrie [1 ]
del Castillo, Nicole [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Rush Med Coll, Div Behav Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Duke Univ, Kenan Inst Ethics, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[6] Carle Illinois Coll Med, Dept Clin Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
CLINICAL TEACHER | 2025年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
Burnout; Communication; Professional identity formation; Restorative justice;
D O I
10.1111/tct.13852
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundRestorative justice (RJ) is an ethical lens that places emphasis on a community's connection and proliferative impact of actions, promoting communication and establishing methods for accountability. RJ practices can be applied on a spectrum, including proactive community-building practices, community discussions in response to an event, and restorative conferences addressing specific incidences of harm. This article describes an intervention that utilized RJ community-building practices within a medical education environment and evaluates its acceptability and feasibility.ApproachDuring the summer of 2023, RJ interventions were planned, executed and assessed within two programmes involving pre-matriculant medical students, physician-assistant studies students and undergraduate students. The interventions utilized community-building circles within small group activities. Capacity building included training for facilitators. Ninety-five students participated in the RJ circles.EvaluationEvaluation included mixed methods pre- and post-intervention surveys as well as qualitative interviews. Ten students (11%) responded to the pre-intervention survey, and 17 responded to the post-intervention survey (18%). Seven responses were obtained from interviews and qualitative surveys. Overall, participant survey responses indicated increased feelings of connection and perceptions of mutual understanding and that the programme provided adequate space to share one's perspective. Qualitative content analysis emphasized community building through RJ circles and their ability to promote connection, meaningful vulnerability, foster peer support and a desire to continue these activities.ImplicationsRJ interventions within medical education environments are feasible and show considerable promise. Participants consistently noted the benefits of greater connection between peers, feelings of support and a desire for these practices to continue.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条