Assessment of appropriate utilization of out-of-office diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of hypertension

被引:0
|
作者
Jnaid, Hussam [1 ]
Aldosari, Mohammed [1 ]
Ahmad, Mohammad Waqar [1 ]
Alendijani, Yaser [1 ]
BaGubair, Amira [1 ]
Alhaffar, Dalal [1 ]
Albasheer, Zainab [1 ]
Alrasheed, Mansour [1 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Family Med & Polyclin, MBC 62,POB 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
关键词
ABPM; AHA guideline; diagnosis; HBPM; hypertension; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; WHITE-COAT; HOME;
D O I
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_757_24
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background:Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices. Methods:A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a random sample of adult patients newly diagnosed with essential hypertension at a tertiary hospital primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2022. Results:This study evaluated the use of ABPM and HBPM in a sample of 268 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, with a mean age of 49.17 +/- 12.69 years. Although ABPM orders were placed for 57.8% of patients, only 48.5% completed the procedure. Notably, 42.2% of hypertension diagnoses were solely based on ABPM, while 7.1% and 1.1% utilized HBPM alone or in combination with ABPM, respectively. This analysis revealed a lower utilization of ABPM among older adults, individuals with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and married patients (P < 0.05). However, this association with marital status, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease was no longer statistically significant in a fully adjusted model (P > 0.05). Conclusion:Out-of-office BP monitoring, particularly ABPM, was underutilized in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially in older age groups and patients with specific comorbidities, who may benefit the most from this method. These results underscore the need for increasing physician knowledge and compliance with the existing guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:5083 / 5089
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An economic evaluation of using a clinical decision rule PRedicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) risk algorithm in the diagnosis of hypertension in primary care
    Monahan, Mark
    Jowett, Sue
    Lovibond, Kate
    Sheppard, James
    McManus, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2016, 30 (10) : 641 - 642
  • [32] Masked hypertension in type 2 diabetes: never take normotension for granted and always assess out-of-office blood pressure
    Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
    Kjeldsen, Sverre E.
    Egan, Brent M.
    Kreutz, Reinhold
    Burnier, Michel
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2022, 31 (01) : 207 - 209
  • [33] Why Is Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement Needed? Home Blood Pressure Measurements Will Increasingly Replace Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension
    Parati, Gianfranco
    Omboni, Stefano
    Bilo, Grzegorz
    HYPERTENSION, 2009, 54 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [34] Urgent need to address quality control issues of out-of-office blood pressure measurement and patient risk assessment
    Hedner, Thomas
    Kjeldsen, Sverre E.
    Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
    Oparil, Suzanne
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2008, 17 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [35] Prospective external validation of the Predicting Out-of-OFfice Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) strategy for triaging ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: an observational cohort study
    Sheppard, James P.
    Stevens, Richard
    Martin, Una
    Mant, Jonathan
    Hobbs, Richard
    McManus, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2018, 32 (10) : 708 - 708
  • [36] OUT-OF-OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION IN EVERYDAY CLINICAL PRACTICE: STILL A LONG JOURNEY TO GO
    Stavropoulos, K.
    Imprialos, K. P.
    Boutari, C.
    Papadopoulos, N.
    Dimakopoulou, A.
    Georgianou, E.
    Binas, A.
    Sachinidis, A.
    Stavropoulos, N.
    Petidis, K.
    Doumas, M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E257 - E257
  • [37] Acceptability and psychological impact of out-of-office monitoring to diagnose hypertension: an evaluation of survey data from primary care patients
    Tompson, Alice C.
    Ward, Alison M.
    McManus, Richard J.
    Perera, Rafael
    Thompson, Matthew J.
    Heneghan, Carl J.
    Nunan, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (683): : E389 - E397
  • [38] Time in therapeutic range for out-of-office blood pressure in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A better risk assessment measurement
    Sakima, Atsushi
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (12) : 3483 - 3485
  • [39] Prospective external validation of the Predicting Out-of-OFfice Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) strategy for triaging ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: observational cohort study
    Sheppard, James P.
    Martin, Una
    Gill, Paramjit
    Stevens, Richard
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    Mant, Jonathan
    Godwin, Marshall
    Hanley, Janet
    McKinstry, Brian
    Myers, Martin
    Nunan, David
    McManus, Richard J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361
  • [40] Office blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg better predicts uncontrolled out-of-office blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension
    Lee, Chan Joo
    Ha, Jeong-Ha
    Kim, Jang Young
    Kim, In-Cheol
    Ryu, Sung Kee
    Rhee, Moo-Yong
    Lee, Ju-Hee
    Lee, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Hae-Young
    Ihm, Sang-Hyun
    Chung, Joong Wha
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Shin, Jinho
    Park, Sungha
    Kario, Kazuomi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (03): : 595 - 605