Development and Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Speech Audiometry Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Shin, Jae sung [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Makara, Mao [1 ]
Sung, Nak-Jun [2 ]
Choi, Seong Jun [3 ]
Kim, Sung yeup [4 ]
Hong, Min [5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Software Convergence, Asan 31538, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Goyang 10245, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Cheonan Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Cheonan 31151, South Korea
[4] Soonchunhyang Univ, Insitute Artificial Intelligence & Software, Asan 31538, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Comp Software Engn, Asan 31538, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
speech audiometry; pure-tone audiometry; multilayer perceptron; recurrent neural network; gradient boosting; XGBoost; regression analysis in audiology; deep learning; machine learning; hearing assessment; PURE-TONE AUDIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/app15063071
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Hearing loss significantly impacts daily communication, making accurate speech audiometry (SA) assessment essential for diagnosis and treatment. However, SA testing is time-consuming and resource-intensive, limiting its accessibility in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a multi-class classification model that predicts SA results using pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data, enabling a more efficient and automated assessment. To achieve this, we implemented and compared MLP, RNN, gradient boosting, and XGBoost models, evaluating their performance using accuracy, F1 score, log loss, and confusion matrix analysis. Experimental results showed that gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy, 86.22%, while XGBoost demonstrated a more balanced classification performance. The MLP achieved 85.77% and the RNN achieved 85.41%, exhibiting relatively low accuracy, with the RNN showing limitations due to the low temporal dependency of PTA data. Additionally, all models faced challenges predicting class 2 (borderline hearing levels) due to overlapping data distributions. These findings suggest that machine learning models, particularly gradient boosting and XGBoost, outperform deep learning models in SA prediction. Future research should focus on feature engineering, hyperparameter optimization, and ensemble approaches to enhance performance and validate real-world applicability. The proposed model could contribute to automating SA prediction and improving hearing assessment efficiency and patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sediment load prediction in Johor river: deep learning versus machine learning models
    Sarmad Dashti Latif
    K. L. Chong
    Ali Najah Ahmed
    Y. F. Huang
    Mohsen Sherif
    Ahmed El-Shafie
    Applied Water Science, 2023, 13
  • [32] Part of Speech Tagging in Urdu: Comparison of Machine and Deep Learning Approaches
    Khan, Wahab
    Daud, Ali
    Khan, Khairullah
    Nasir, Jamal Abdul
    Basheri, Mohammed
    Aljohani, Naif
    Alotaibi, Fahd Saleh
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 38918 - 38936
  • [33] Development of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Prediction Models for PM2.5 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Phuc Hieu
    Dao, Nguyen Khoi
    Nguyen, Ly Sy Phu
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (10)
  • [34] Development of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Prediction Models for PM2.5 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Phuc Hieu
    Dao, Nguyen Khoi
    Nguyen, Ly Sy Phu
    Atmosphere, 15 (10):
  • [35] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques in promoter prediction across diverse species
    Bhandari, Nikita
    Khare, Satyajeet
    Walambe, Rahee
    Kotecha, Ketan
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
  • [36] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques in promoter prediction across diverse species
    Bhandari N.
    Khare S.
    Walambe R.
    Kotecha K.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2021, 7 : 1 - 17
  • [37] Methodological comparison of machine learning models for childhood asthma prediction
    Patel, D.
    Gupta, R.
    Smirg, A.
    Foong, R.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2023, 28 : 124 - 124
  • [38] Comparison of Machine learning models for Parkinson's Disease prediction
    Kumar, Tapan
    Sharma, Pradyumn
    Prakash, Nupur
    2020 11TH IEEE ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2020, : 195 - 199
  • [39] Comparison Of Rectal Temperature Prediction Models Utilizing Machine Learning
    Belval, Luke N.
    Hosokawa, Yuri
    Vandermark, Lesley W.
    Stearns, Rebecca L.
    Armstrong, Lawrence E.
    Casa, Douglas J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 454 - 454
  • [40] Grapevine Phenology Prediction: A Comparison of Physical and Machine Learning Models
    Lacueva-Perez, Francisco J.
    Ilarri, Sergio
    Barriuso, Juan J.
    Balduque, Joaquin
    Labata, Gorka
    del-Hoyo, Rafael
    BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, DAWAK 2022, 2022, 13428 : 263 - 269