共 17 条
Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations
被引:0
|作者:
Alabi, Adekunle
[1
]
Ge, Mengyuan
[1
]
Momper, Jeremiah D.
[1
]
Tsunoda, Shirley M.
[1
]
Kelner, Michael J.
[1
]
Fitzgerald, Robert L.
[1
]
Suhandynata, Raymond T.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Pathol, La Jolla, CA USA
[2] UC San Diego Hlth, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE
|
2025年
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS;
TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS;
MASS-SPECTROMETRY;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
FK506;
METABOLITES;
ASSAY;
QUANTIFICATION;
CYCLOSPORINE;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1093/jalm/jfae156
中图分类号:
R446 [实验室诊断];
R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Background Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression. Methods Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care. Results External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R-2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was <= 11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens). Conclusions Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文