Infrared small target detection method based on nonconvex low-rank Tuck decomposition

被引:0
作者
Yang, Jun-Gang [1 ]
Liu, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yong-Xian [1 ]
Li, Bo-Yang [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Qian [1 ]
Sheng, Wei-Dong [1 ]
An, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Elect Sci & Technol, Changsha 410073, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangtan Univ, Coll Automat & Elect Informat, Xiangtan 411100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
infrared small target detection; nonconvex low-rank Tuck decomposition; nonconvex rank approximation norm; symmetric GaussSeidel based alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm; TENSOR MODEL;
D O I
10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.02.018
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Low-rank and sparse decomposition method (LRSD) has been widely concerned in the field of infrared small target detection because of its good detection performance. However, existing LRSD-based methods still face the prob- lems of low detection performance and slow detection speed in complex scenes. Although existing low-rank Tuck de- composition methods have achieved satisfactory detection performance in complex scenes, they need to define ranks in advance according to experience, and estimating the ranks too large or too small will lead to missed detection or false alarms. Meanwhile, the size of rank is different in different scenes. This means that they are not suitable for real-world scenes. To solve this problem, this paper uses non-convex rank approach norm to constrain latent factors of low-rank Tucker decomposition, which avoids setting ranks in advance according to experience and improves the robustness of the algorithm in different scenes. Meanwhile, a symmetric GaussSeidel (sGS) based alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm (sGSADMM) is designed to solve the proposed method. Different from ADMM, the sGSADMM algorithm can use more structural information to obtain higher accuracy. Extensive experiment results show that the pro- posed method is superior to the other advanced algorithms in detection performance and background suppression.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 311
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   A Local Contrast Method for Small Infrared Target Detection [J].
Chen, C. L. Philip ;
Li, Hong ;
Wei, Yantao ;
Xia, Tian ;
Tang, Yuan Yan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (01) :574-581
[2]   Reweighted Infrared Patch-Tensor Model With Both Nonlocal and Local Priors for Single-Frame Small Target Detection [J].
Dai, Yimian ;
Wu, Yiquan .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (08) :3752-3767
[3]   Max-Mean and Max-Median filters for detection of small-targets [J].
Deshpande, SD ;
Er, MH ;
Ronda, V ;
Chan, P .
SIGNAL AND DATA PROCESSING OF SMALL TARGETS 1999, 1999, 3809 :74-83
[4]   Infrared Patch-Image Model for Small Target Detection in a Single Image [J].
Gao, Chenqiang ;
Meng, Deyu ;
Yang, Yi ;
Wang, Yongtao ;
Zhou, Xiaofang ;
Hauptmann, Alexander G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 22 (12) :4996-5009
[5]  
Hui B., 2019, Sci. Data Bank, V5, P4
[6]   Robust PCA via Nonconvex Rank Approximation [J].
Kang, Zhao ;
Peng, Chong ;
Cheng, Qiang .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2015, :211-220
[7]  
Kong X., 2021, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., V60, P1
[8]   Monte Carlo Linear Clustering with Single-Point Supervision is Enough for Infrared Small Target Detection [J].
Li, Boyang ;
Wang, Yingqian ;
Wang, Longguang ;
Zhang, Fei ;
Liu, Ting ;
Lin, Zaiping ;
An, Wei ;
Guo, Yulan .
2023 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, ICCV, 2023, :1009-1019
[9]   Mixed-Precision Network Quantization for Infrared Small Target Segmentation [J].
Li, Boyang ;
Wang, Longguang ;
Wang, Yingqian ;
Wu, Tianhao ;
Lin, Zaiping ;
Li, Miao ;
An, Wei ;
Guo, Yulan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 :1-12
[10]   Dense Nested Attention Network for Infrared Small Target Detection [J].
Li, Boyang ;
Xiao, Chao ;
Wang, Longguang ;
Wang, Yingqian ;
Lin, Zaiping ;
Li, Miao ;
An, Wei ;
Guo, Yulan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2023, 32 :1745-1758