BioResilience: harnessing design thinking to strengthen academic resilience in biology learning

被引:2
作者
Honra, Joelash R. [1 ]
Monterola, Sheryl Lyn C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Philippines, Coll Educ, Div Curriculum & Instruct, Quezon City 1649, Philippines
[2] Univ Philippines, Natl Inst Sci & Math Educ Dev, Quezon City, Philippines
来源
PEDAGOGIES | 2024年
关键词
Academic resilience; biology education; design thinking; embedded quasi-experimental; innovative pedagogy;
D O I
10.1080/1554480X.2024.2442978
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores the effects of Design Thinking-Oriented Biology Instruction (DTOBI) on academic resilience among high school students, contrasting it with conventional teaching methods. A total of 97 students participated, divided into two groups: one receiving DTOBI and the other following the traditional instruction of biology. Using an embedded quasi-experimental design, the researchers used the Filipino Learners' Academic Resilience Scale (FLARS) to measure resilience before and after a six-week intervention. Statistical analysis, including independent samples t-tests, demonstrated that DTOBI significantly improved resilience, with a medium effect size highlighting its practical significance. Qualitative insights from focus group discussions revealed that the hands-on, collaborative, and real-world problem-solving activities in DTOBI fostered greater resilience. Students described how DTOBI encouraged creative problem-solving and perseverance, contrasting with the more passive learning experiences of conventional methods. These results suggest that incorporating design thinking into biology education can enhance the resilience and overall academic performance of students. The study stresses the value of innovative pedagogical strategies in developing crucial non-cognitive skills and improving educational outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Akbari A., 2014, International Journal of School Health, V1, P7, DOI [DOI 10.17795/INTJSH-22363, https://doi.org/10.17795/intjsh-22363]
[2]  
Alhazmi A, 2020, Computer Systems: Science & Engineering, P33, DOI [10.1145/3403746.3403902, DOI 10.1145/3403746.3403902]
[3]  
Bahrami F, 2017, Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, V24, P217
[4]   Exploring the impact of design thinking tool among design undergraduates: a study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively [J].
Balakrishnan, Balamuralithara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (03) :1799-1812
[5]   Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning [J].
Bernardo, Allan B. I. ;
Cordel, Macario O. ;
Calleja, Marissa Ortiz ;
Teves, Jude Michael M. ;
Yap, Sashmir A. ;
Chua, Unisse C. .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01)
[6]  
Brown T, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P84
[7]  
Choo OZH, 2019, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), V8, P637, DOI [10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20340, 10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20340, DOI 10.11591/IJERE.V8I4.20340]
[8]   Designing a mixed methods study in primary care [J].
Creswell, JW ;
Fetters, MD ;
Ivankova, NV .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (01) :7-12
[9]   Addressing Organizational Cultural Conflicts in Engineering with Design Thinking [J].
Eddington, Sean M. ;
Corple, Danielle ;
Buzzanell, Patrice M. ;
Zoltowski, Carla ;
Brightman, Andrew .
NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (03) :263-284
[10]   An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers [J].
Ferguson, Christopher J. .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, 40 (05) :532-538