Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Stojadinovic, Miroslav [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Milorad [2 ]
Jankovic, Slobodan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Svetozara Markov 69, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[2] Univ Clin Ctr Serbia, Clin Nephrol, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Pharmacol & Toxicol Dept, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsy; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Intermediate-risk; RADIATION-THERAPY; STRATIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-024-04342-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.MethodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of <= 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.ConclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Likelihood of Death From Prostate Cancer in Men With Favorable or Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Disease
    Keane, Florence K.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Zhang, Danjie
    Loffredo, Marian J.
    Kantoff, Philip W.
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (12) : 1787 - 1793
  • [42] Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI
    Bertelli, Elena
    Mercatelli, Laura
    Marzi, Chiara
    Pachetti, Eva
    Baccini, Michela
    Barucci, Andrea
    Colantonio, Sara
    Gherardini, Luca
    Lattavo, Lorenzo
    Pascali, Maria Antonietta
    Agostini, Simone
    Miele, Vittorio
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [43] Active Surveillance for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Protocols and Outcomes
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Morozov, Andrey
    Taratkin, Mark
    Barret, Eric
    Kozlov, Vasiliy
    Singla, Nirmish
    Gomez Rivas, Juan
    Podoinitsin, Alexey
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Glybochko, Petr
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2020, 18 (06) : E739 - E753
  • [44] Recommendations of Active Surveillance for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists
    Kim, Simon P.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Yu, James B.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Kim, Albert
    Gross, Cary P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 189 - 195
  • [45] Active surveillance-much safety, little recruitment Is it possible to extend the indication for "intermediate-risk" prostate cancer?
    Weissbach, Lothar
    Boedefeld, Edith A.
    Herden, Jan
    UROLOGE, 2021, 60 (10): : 1304 - 1312
  • [46] Making a case “against” focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Paolo Gontero
    Giancarlo Marra
    Dogu Teber
    Shahrokh Shariat
    Selami Albayrak
    Rafael Coelho
    Simon Tanguay
    Badrinath Konety
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 719 - 728
  • [47] Making a case "against" focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Gontero, Paolo
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Teber, Dogu
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Albayrak, Selami
    Coelho, Rafael
    Tanguay, Simon
    Konety, Badrinath
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 719 - 728
  • [48] Active Surveillance-Is It Feasible for Intermediate-risk Localised Prostate Cancer?
    Mukherjee, Subhabrata
    Promponas, Ioannis
    Petrides, Neophytos
    Hossain, Dafader
    Abbaraju, Jayasimha
    Madaan, Sanjeev
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 24 : 17 - 24
  • [49] Transurethral Vapor Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Dixon, Christopher M.
    Levin, Richard M.
    Cantrill, Christopher H.
    Regelman, Mikhail
    Spilseth, Benjamin
    Tutrone, Ronald F. F.
    White, Michael A.
    Milbank, Aaron J.
    Warlick, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [50] Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Wenzel, Mike
    Preisser, Felix
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Welte, Maria N.
    Humke, Clara
    Wittler, Clarissa
    Wuernschimmel, Christoph
    Becker, Andreas
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kluth, Luis A.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8