Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Stojadinovic, Miroslav [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Milorad [2 ]
Jankovic, Slobodan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Svetozara Markov 69, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[2] Univ Clin Ctr Serbia, Clin Nephrol, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Pharmacol & Toxicol Dept, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsy; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Intermediate-risk; RADIATION-THERAPY; STRATIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-024-04342-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.MethodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of <= 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.ConclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prostate Cancer Detection and Analysis using Advanced Machine Learning
    Alzboon, Mowafaq Salem
    Al-Batah, Mohammad Subhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (08) : 388 - 396
  • [22] Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance
    Sherer, Michael, V
    Leonard, Austin J.
    Nelson, Tyler J.
    Guram, Kripa
    De Moraes, Gustavo Rodrigues
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Kane, Christopher
    McKay, Rana R.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 50 : 61 - 67
  • [23] Importance of prostate volume in the stratification of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Moschini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Fossati, Nicola
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Damiano, Rocco
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 555 - 561
  • [24] Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy as monotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Ju, Andrew W.
    Wang, Hongkun
    Oermann, Eric K.
    Sherer, Benjamin A.
    Uhm, Sunghae
    Chen, Viola J.
    Pendharkar, Arjun V.
    Hanscom, Heather N.
    Kim, Joy S.
    Lei, Siyuan
    Suy, Simeng
    Lynch, John H.
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Collins, Sean P.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [25] Prostate-specific antigen density as the best predictor of low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a cohort study
    Park, Dae Hyoung
    Yu, Ji Hyeong
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (03) : 502 - 514
  • [26] A phase II trial of apalutamide for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and molecular correlates
    Hahn, Andrew W.
    Manyam, Ganiraju C.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Zhang, Miao
    Yu, Yao
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Chery, Lisly
    Pisters, Louis L.
    Ward, John F.
    Gregg, Justin R.
    Papadopoulos, John
    Kamat, Ashish M.
    Lozano, Marisa
    Hoang, Anh
    Broom, Bradley
    Wang, Xuemei
    Huff, Chad D.
    Logothetis, Christopher J.
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Pilie, Patrick G.
    Davis, John W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (03) : 449 - 458
  • [27] Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy as monotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Andrew W Ju
    Hongkun Wang
    Eric K Oermann
    Benjamin A Sherer
    Sunghae Uhm
    Viola J Chen
    Arjun V Pendharkar
    Heather N Hanscom
    Joy S Kim
    Siyuan Lei
    Simeng Suy
    John H Lynch
    Anatoly Dritschilo
    Sean P Collins
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [28] MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING HEMODYNAMIC DETERIORATION OF PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Xu, Jiatang
    Hu, Zhensheng
    Miao, Jianhang
    Cao, Lin
    Tian, Zhenluan
    Yao, Chen
    Kai, Huang
    SHOCK, 2024, 61 (01): : 68 - 75
  • [29] Role of combined radiation and androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer Statement from the DEGRO working group on prostate cancer
    Beck, Marcus
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Albrecht, Clemens
    Flentje, Michael
    Ganswindt, Ute
    Hoecht, Stefan
    Hoelscher, Tobias
    Mueller, Arndt-Christian
    Niehoff, Peter
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Sedlmayer, Felix
    Zips, Daniel
    Zschaeck, Sebastian
    Budach, Volker
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [30] Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer
    Savdie, Richard
    Aning, Jonathan
    So, Alan I.
    Black, Peter C.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (10) : 605.e1 - 605.e8