Revised safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain LMG S-24584 produced by a modified process

被引:0
作者
Zorn, Holger
EFSA Panel Food Enzymes FEZ, Jose Manuel
Barat Baviera, Jose Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Catania, Francesco
Gadermaier, Gabriele
Greiner, Ralf
Mayo, Baltasar
Mortensen, Alicja
Roos, Yrjo Henrik
Solano, Marize L. M.
Sramkova, Monika
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Peluso, Silvia
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Cavanna, Daniele
Gomes, Ana
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
Liu, Yi
机构
关键词
EC; 3.2.1.8; Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase; genetically modified microorganism; 4-beta-d-xylan xylanohydrolase; Bacillus subtilis; EFSA-Q-2015-00065; EFSA-Q-2023-00878; ALPHA-AMYLASE; SENSITIZATION; CELLULASE; XYLANASE;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9126
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The food enzyme endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (4-beta-d-xylan xylanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.8) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain LMG S-24584 by Puratos NV. In a previous opinion, the Panel noted the presence of recombinant DNA in all food enzyme batches tested. As a follow-up, the applicant changed the manufacturing process of the food enzyme and provided new data. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns and the production strain fulfils the requirements for the QPS approach to safety assessment. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in the processing of cereals and other grains for the production of baked products. Dietary exposure is estimated to be up to 0.010 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. As no concerns arising from the microbial source and its genetic modifications or from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considered that toxicological tests were not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Karenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [2] Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?
    Armentia, A.
    Diaz-Perales, A.
    Castrodeza, J.
    Duenas-Laita, A.
    Palacin, A.
    Fernandez, S.
    [J]. ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 2009, 37 (04) : 203 - 204
  • [3] Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA
    Barlow, Sue
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John D.
    Dybing, Erik
    Flynn, Albert
    Fruijtier-Poelloth, Claudia
    Hardy, Anthony
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Le Neindre, Pierre
    Schans, Jan
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Skerfving, Staffan
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (12)
  • [4] Guidance on Safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements
    Barlow, Susan
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John D.
    Flynn, Albert
    Galli, Corrado L.
    Hardy, Anthony
    Jany, Klaus-Dieter
    Jeger, Michael-John
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Larsen, John-Christian
    Lovell, David
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Smulders, Frans
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (09)
  • [5] ALLERGIC REACTION AFTER EATING ALPHA-AMYLASE (ASP-O-2)-CONTAINING BREAD
    BAUR, X
    CZUPPON, AB
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (01) : 85 - 87
  • [6] Clinical responses to ingested fungal alpha-amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus?
    Cullinan, P
    Cook, A
    Jones, M
    Cannon, J
    Fitzgerald, B
    Taylor, AJN
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1997, 52 (03) : 346 - 349
  • [7] Prevalence of sensitisation to cellulase and xylanase in bakery workers
    Elms, J
    Fishwick, D
    Walker, J
    Rawbone, R
    Jeffrey, P
    Griffin, P
    Gibson, M
    Curran, AD
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 60 (10) : 802 - 804
  • [9] FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization), 2006, FAO JECFA Monographs, V3, P63
  • [10] Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 15: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2021
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Allende, Ana
    Alvarez-Ordonez, Avelino
    Bolton, Declan
    Bover-Cid, Sara
    Chemaly, Marianne
    Davies, Robert
    De Cesare, Alessandra
    Hilbert, Friederike
    Lindqvist, Roland
    Nauta, Maarten
    Peixe, Luisa
    Ru, Giuseppe
    Simmons, Marion
    Skandamis, Panagiotis
    Suffredini, Elisabetta
    Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
    Escamez, Pablo Salvador Fernandez
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Querol, Amparo
    Sijtsma, Lolke
    Suarez, Juan Evaristo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Vlak, Just
    Barizzone, Fulvio
    Hempen, Michaela
    Herman, Lieve
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2022, 20 (01)