Machine learning-driven survival prediction in gestational trophoblastic neoplasms: a focus on PSTT and ETT prognosis

被引:1
作者
Alshwayyat, Sakhr [1 ]
Haddadin, Zena [1 ]
Alshwayyat, Mustafa [1 ]
Alshwayyat, Tala Abdulsalam [1 ]
Odat, Ramez M. [1 ]
Al-kurdi, Mohammed Al-mahdi [2 ]
Kharmoum, Saoussane [3 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Univ Aleppo, Fac Med, Aleppo, Syria
[3] Reg Hosp Ctr, Med Oncol, Tangier, Morocco
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
clinical decision making; machine learning; placenta; prognosis; survival analysis; treatment outcome; trophoblastic tumor; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; TUMOR; CHEMOTHERAPY; DISEASE; METASTASES; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1457531
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT) have not been well summarized. Consequently, we conducted the largest to date series of samples of both types and employed machine learning (ML) to assess treatment effectiveness and develop accurate prognostic models for patients with GTN. Gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) was used as the control group to show the clinical features of PTSS and ETT. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database provided the data used for this study's analysis. To identify the prognostic variables, we conducted Cox regression analysis and constructed prognostic models using five ML algorithms to predict the 5-year survival. A validation method incorporating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the accuracy and reliability of the ML models. We also investigated the role of multiple therapeutic options using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: The study population comprised 725 patients. Among them, 139 patients had ETT, 107 had PSTT, and 479 had GCC. There were no significant differences in survival between the different tumor groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that metastasis was a significant prognostic factor for GCC, while older age and radiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for PTSS and ETT. ML models revealed that the Gradient Boosting classifier accurately predicted the outcomes, followed by the random forest classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, and multilayer perceptron models. The most significant contributing factors were tumor size, year of diagnosis, age, and race. Discussion: Our study provides a method for treatment and prognostic assessment of patients with GTN. The ML we developed can be used as a convenient individualized tool to facilitate clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Placental site trophoblastic tumor and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor: Clinical and pathological features, prognostic variables and treatment strategy [J].
Angiolo, Gadducci ;
Silvestro, Carinelli ;
Elena, Guerrieri Maria ;
Damiano, Aletti Giovanni .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 153 (03) :684-693
[2]   Placental site trophoblastic tumor: A study of 55 cases and review of the literature emphasizing factors of prognostic significance [J].
Baergen, RN ;
Rutgers, JL ;
Young, RH ;
Osann, K ;
Scully, RE .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (03) :511-520
[3]   The effect of early pregnancy following chemotherapy on disease relapse and foetal outcome in women treated for gestational trophoblastic tumours [J].
Blagden, SP ;
Foskett, MA ;
Fisher, RA ;
Short, D ;
Fuller, S ;
Newlands, ES ;
Seckl, MJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (01) :26-30
[4]   Gestational choriocarcinoma [J].
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle ;
Mutch, David ;
Vergote, Ignace ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. ;
Prat, Jaime ;
Concin, Nicole ;
Ngoi, Natalie Yan Li ;
Coleman, Robert L. ;
Enomoto, Takayuki ;
Takehara, Kazuhiro ;
Denys, Hannelore ;
Lorusso, Domenica ;
Takano, Masashi ;
Sagae, Satoru ;
Wimberger, Pauline ;
Segev, Yakir ;
Kim, Se Ik ;
Kim, Jae-Weon ;
Herrera, Fernanda ;
Mariani, Andrea ;
Brooks, Rebecca A. ;
Tan, David ;
Paolini, Biagio ;
Chiappa, Valentina ;
Longo, Mariangela ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco ;
Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti ;
Di Donato, Violante ;
Caruso, Giuseppe ;
Colombo, Nicoletta ;
Pignata, Sandro ;
Zannoni, Gianfranco ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Monk, Bradley J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (10) :1504-1514
[5]   Current chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease [J].
Braga, Antonio ;
Paiva, Gabriela ;
Cattai, Cassia Juliana ;
Elias, Kevin M. ;
Horowitz, Neil S. ;
Berkowitz, Ross S. .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2023, 24 (02) :245-258
[6]   Prognostic factors and treatment for placental site trophoblastic tumor - Report of 3 cases and analysis of 88 cases [J].
Chang, YL ;
Chang, TC ;
Hsueh, S ;
Huang, KG ;
Wang, PN ;
Liu, HP ;
Soong, YK .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 73 (02) :216-222
[7]   Treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease in the 2020s [J].
Clark, James J. ;
Slater, Susanna ;
Seckl, Michael J. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 33 (01) :7-12
[8]   Women with breast cancer taking chemotherapy: depression symptoms and treatment adherence [J].
de Souza, Bianca Fresche ;
de Moraes, Jessica Andrade ;
Inocenti, Aline ;
dos Santos, Manoel Antonio ;
Bauer de Camargo Silva, Ana Elisa ;
Miasso, Adriana Inocenti .
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2014, 22 (05) :866-873
[9]   Machine Learning in Medicine [J].
Deo, Rahul C. .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (20) :1920-1930
[10]   Placental site trophoblastic tumor: A 17-year experience at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center [J].
Feltmate, CM ;
Genest, DR ;
Wise, L ;
Bernstein, MR ;
Goldstein, DP ;
Berkowitz, RS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (03) :415-419