Comparing Participation Models in Electricity Markets for Hybrid Energy-Storage Resources

被引:0
作者
Bhattacharjee, Shubhrajit [1 ]
Sioshansi, Ramteen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zareipour, Hamidreza [5 ]
机构
[1] New York Independent Syst Operator, Rensselaer, NY 12144 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Carnegie Mellon Elect Ind Ctr, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Wilton E Scott Inst Energy Innovat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Integrated Syst Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
Energy storage; Biological system modeling; Hybrid power systems; Electricity; Adaptation models; Generators; Production; Power-system economics; energy storage; renewable generation; hybrid resource; market power; game theory; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION; BIDDING STRATEGY; WIND POWER; SYSTEMS; DECOMPOSITION; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2024.3397590
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Wholesale electricity markets are designing market-participation models for hybrid resources that consist of energy storage and generation. This paper investigates the strategic behavior under two commonly proposed market-participation models of a hybrid resource that consists of solar and energy storage. The first is co-located hybrid resource, wherein the solar and energy storage submit separate offers. The second is integrated hybrid resource, wherein the solar and energy storage provide a single integrated offer and the market operator treats the resource as a single unit. We employ a bi-level stochastic optimization where the upper-level determines the hybrid resource's offers, and the lower-level represents market clearing by the market operator under different uncertain operating conditions. The model is applied to a simple example and to a real-world case study that is based on Alberta's electricity system. Results demonstrate that in most cases the two market-participation models are comparable. Co-located hybrid resource yields slight hybrid-resource- and generator-profit increases and offsetting social-welfare losses compared to integrated hybrid resource.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 661
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Hybrid Resources: Challenges, Implications, Opportunities, and Innovation
    Ahlstrom, Mark
    Mays, Jacob
    Gimon, Eric
    Gelston, Andrew
    Murphy, Caitlin
    Denholm, Paul
    Nemet, Greg
    [J]. IEEE POWER & ENERGY MAGAZINE, 2021, 19 (06): : 37 - 44
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, staff report
  • [3] Affinely Adjustable Robust Bidding Strategy for a Solar Plant Paired With a Battery Storage
    Attarha, Ahmad
    Amjady, Nima
    Dehghan, Shahab
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (03) : 2629 - 2640
  • [4] Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review
    Beaudin, Marc
    Zareipour, Hamidreza
    Schellenberglabe, Anthony
    Rosehart, William
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (04) : 302 - 314
  • [5] Bertsekas Dimitri P, 1998, Athena Scientific Optimization and Computation Series
  • [6] Energy Storage Participation in Wholesale Markets: The Impact of State-of-Energy Management
    Bhattacharjee, Shubhrajit
    Sioshansi, Ramteen
    Zareipour, Hamidreza
    [J]. IEEE OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2022, 9 : 173 - 182
  • [7] Blair N., 2014, SYSTEM ADVISOR MODEL
  • [8] Strategies for combined operation of PV/storage systems integrated into electricity markets
    Carriere, Thomas
    Vernay, Christophe
    Pitaval, Sebastien
    Neirac, Francois-Pascal
    Kariniotakis, George
    [J]. IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2020, 14 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [9] Conejo A.J., 2017, Optimization in Engineering. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, V120, P337, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-56769-36, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56769-36]
  • [10] Denholm P, 2017, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP- 6A20-68737