ProCUSNet: Prostate Cancer Detection on B-mode Transrectal Ultrasound Using Artificial Intell igence for Targeting During Prostate Biopsies

被引:0
|
作者
Rusu, Mirabela [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Jahanandish, Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Vesal, Sulaiman [1 ,2 ]
Li, Cynthia Xinran [3 ]
Bhattacharya, Indrani [1 ]
Venkataraman, Rajesh [4 ]
Zhou, Steve Ran [2 ]
Kornberg, Zachary [2 ]
Sommer, Elijah Richard [5 ]
Khandwala, Yash Samir [2 ]
Hockman, Luke [2 ]
Zhou, Zhien [6 ]
Choi, Moon Hyung [7 ]
Ghanouni, Pejman [1 ]
Fan, Richard E. [2 ]
Sonn, Geoffrey A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Inst Computat & Math Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Eigen Hlth Serv Llc, Grass Valley, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, 300 Pasteur, Stanford, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 8卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; B-mode transrectal ultrasound; Prostate cancer; ProCUSNet; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective: To assess whether conventional brightness-mode (B-mode) transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate reveal clinically significant cancers with the help of artificial intelligence methods. Methods: This study included 2986 men who underwent biopsies at two institutions. We trained the PROstate Cancer detection on B-mode transrectal UltraSound images NETwork (ProCUSNet) to determine whether ultrasound can reliably detect cancer. Specifically, ProCUSNet is based on the well-established nnUNet frameworks, and seeks to detect and outline clinically significant cancer on three-dimensional (3D) examinations reconstructed from 2D screen captures. We compared ProCUSNet against (1) reference labels (n = 515 patients), (2) eight readers that interpreted B-mode ultrasound (n = 20-80 patients), and (3) radiologists interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinical care (n = 110 radical prostatectomy patients). Key findings and limitations: ProCUSNet found 82% clinically significant cancer cases with a lesion boundary error of up to 2.67 mm and detected 42% more lesions than ultrasound readers (sensitivity: 0.86 vs 0.44, p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test, Bonferroni correction). Furthermore, ProCUSNet has similar performance to radiologists interpreting MRI when accounting for registration errors (sensitivity: 0.79 vs 0.78, p > 0.05, Wilcoxon test, Bonferroni correction), while having the same targeting utility as a supplement to systematic biopsies. Conclusions and clinical implications: ProCUSNet can localize clinically significant cancer on screen capture B-mode ultrasound, a task that is particularly challenging for clinicians reading these examinations. As a supplement to systematic biopsies, ProCUSNet appears comparable with MRI, suggesting its utility for targeting suspicious lesions during the biopsy and possibly for screening using ultrasound alone, in the absence of MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 485
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DiaPat urine test for prostate cancer. Predictive value for results of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies
    Oberpenning, F.
    von Knobloch, R.
    Sprute, W.
    Roth, S.
    Rathert, M.
    Bierer, S.
    Gerss, J.
    Semjonow, A.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (06): : 735 - 739
  • [22] Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies
    Tillmann Loch
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 375 - 380
  • [23] Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies
    Loch, Tillmann
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) : 375 - 380
  • [24] Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and prostate cancer detection: A study based on more than 7000 transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in Ghana
    Mensah, James Edward
    Akpakli, Evans
    Kyei, Mathew
    Klufio, Kenneth
    Asiedu, Isaac
    Asante, Kweku
    Toboh, Bernard
    Ashaley, Micheal Darko
    Addo, Ben Molai
    Morton, Bernard
    Quist, Erica Akoto
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 51
  • [25] The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naive Men
    Ye, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chichen
    Zheng, Lei
    Wang, Qihao
    Wu, Qiyou
    Tu, Xiang
    Bao, Yige
    Wei, Qiang
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 64 : 1 - 8
  • [26] Impact of using 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound in real-time targeting of transrectal prostate biopsies: initial experience
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    El-Shefai, Ahmed
    Stephenson, Andrew
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (05) : 1201 - 1206
  • [27] Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer and determination of tumor volume, grade, and seminal vesicle invasion
    Norberg, M
    Holmberg, L
    Busch, C
    Haggman, M
    Egevad, L
    Magnusson, A
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [28] Diffusion MRI Predicts Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy Results in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Chu, Woei-Chyn
    Tseng, Wen-Yih Isaac
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (02) : 356 - 363
  • [29] The utility and limitations of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound scanning for the detection of prostate cancer in different area of prostate
    Xie, Shao Wei
    Dong, Bai Jun
    Xia, Jian Guo
    Li, Hong Li
    Zhang, Shi Jun
    Du, Jing
    Yang, Wen Qi
    Li, Feng Hua
    Xue, Wei
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 70 (03) : 281 - 290
  • [30] Machine Learning for Multiparametric Ultrasound Classification of Prostate Cancer using B-mode, Shear-Wave Elastography, and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Radiomics
    Wildeboer, R. R.
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    van Sloun, R. J. G.
    Wijkstra, H.
    Salomon, G.
    Mischi, M.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2019, : 1902 - 1905