Retention and dropout from sublingual and extended-release buprenorphine treatment: A comparative analysis of data from a nationally representative sample of commercially-insured people with opiod use disorder in the United States

被引:0
作者
Ivasiy, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Madden, Lynn M. [1 ,3 ]
Johnson, Kimberly A. [4 ]
Machavariani, Eteri [1 ]
Ahmad, Bachar [5 ]
Oliveros, David [1 ]
Tan, Jiale [6 ]
Kil, Natalie [1 ]
Altice, Frederick L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Sect Infect Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res AIDS, New Haven, CT USA
[3] APT Fdn, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Behav & Community Sci, Dept Mental Hlth Law & Policy, Tampa, FL USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Yale Univ, Program Computat Biol & Bioinformat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[8] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Opioid use disorder; Buprenorphine; Extended-release buprenorphine; Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD); Communicable comorbidities; HIV; HCV; Treatment initiation; Treatment retention; DEPENDENCE; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104748
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Maintenance on medications for opioid use disorder, particularly buprenorphine, is critical for reducing overdose risk and improving health outcomes in the United States. This study evaluates retention and dropout probabilities between sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) and extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) among commercially-insured individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study using Meretive (TM) Markeskan (R) claims data from 2019 to 2020. A multi-state Markov model assessed transitions between treatment states over 12 months. Participants: The study included 58,933 individuals aged 18-64 years with OUD, initiating SL-BUP (n = 57,520) or XR-BUP (n = 1,413). XR-BUP patients were divided into XR-BUP only (n = 684; 49 %) and XR-BUP with supplemental SL-BUP (XR-BUP+sSL; n = 729; 51 %). Measurements: Primary outcomes included probabilities of remaining in treatment or transitioning between states at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The impact of dosage and days of supply on retention was also examined. Results: The probability of permanent treatment dropout at 6 months was similar for SL-BUP (38.59 %, 95 % CI: 37.9 %-39.4 %) and XR-BUP (41.3 % 95 %CI: 36.8 %-46.1 %), yet the probability of remaining in treatment was significantly higher for SL-BUP than XR-BUP (49.5 %; 95 %CI: 48.8 %-50.1 % vs. 13.5 % 95 % CI: 10.5 %-16.5 %). The high proportion of individuals initially prescribed XR-BUP later transitioned to SL-BUP. Higher doses and longer days supplied of SL-BUP reduced dropout rates. Among patients receiving >= 16 mg/day and >= 28 days, dropout probabilities were 5.7 % (95 % CI: 5.4 %-6.0 %) at 1 month, 15.4 % (95 % CI: 14.8 %-16.2 %) at 3 months, 28.0 % (95 % CI: 26.9 %-29.2 %) at 6 months, and 47.8 % (95 %CI: 45.2 %-49.5 %) at 12 months. In contrast, patients prescribed <16 mg/day and <28 days had a 46.3 % (95 %CI: 45.0 %-47.6 %) dropout rate by 6 months. Conclusion: SL-BUP demonstrates higher retention rates and lower dropout compared to XR-BUP in real-world settings. Optimizing SL-BUP dosing and providing extended supplies can improve retention and reduce treatment discontinuation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Al Faysal J., 2025
  • [2] Altice FL, 2022, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V9, P852, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00318-2
  • [3] The impact of relaxation of methadone take-home protocols on treatment outcomes in the COVID-19 era
    Amram, Ofer
    Amiri, Solmaz
    Panwala, Victoria
    Lutz, Robert
    Joudrey, Paul J.
    Socias, Eugenia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2021, 47 (06) : 722 - 729
  • [4] [Anonymous], Buprenorphine Quick Start Guide
  • [5] High Rate of Discontinuation during Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Treatment in Patients with Psychotic Disorders
    Auxilia, Anna Maria
    Buoli, Massimiliano
    Caldiroli, Alice
    Carnevali, Greta Silvia
    Tringali, Agnese
    Nava, Roberto
    Clerici, Massimo
    Capuzzi, Enrico
    [J]. BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [6] Use of a multi-state model in a claims database: illustration with methadone
    Boucherie, Quentin
    Pauly, Vanessa
    Frauger, Elisabeth
    Thirion, Xavier
    Pradel, Vincent
    Micallef, Joelle
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 (09) : 991 - 998
  • [7] 'Not at all what I had expected': Discontinuing treatment with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX): A qualitative study
    Brenna, Ida Halvorsen
    Marciuch, Anne
    Birkeland, Bente
    Veseth, Marius
    Rostad, Bente
    Loberg, Else-Marie
    Solli, Kristin Klemmetsby
    Tanum, Lars
    Weimand, Bente
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2022, 136
  • [8] A longitudinal comparison of retention in buprenorphine and methadone treatment for opioid dependence in New South Wales, Australia
    Burns, Lucy
    Gisev, Natasa
    Larney, Sarah
    Dobbins, Timothy
    Gibson, Amy
    Kimber, Jo
    Larance, Briony
    Mattick, Richard P.
    Butler, Tony
    Degenhardt, Louisa
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2015, 110 (04) : 646 - 655
  • [9] Canadian Agency for D Technologies in H. Pharmacoeconomic Review Report: Buprenorphine extended-release injection (Sublocade): (Indivior Canada Ltd.), 2019, The Biggest Tech Product Flops of the 2010s
  • [10] Use of buprenorphine for those with employer-sponsored insurance during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Cantor, Jonathan
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Haffajee, Rebecca
    Pera, Megan F.
    Bravata, Dena M.
    Stein, Bradley D.
    Whaley, Christopher M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2021, 129