Liability and Trust Analysis Framework for Multi-Actor Dynamic Microservices

被引:0
|
作者
Anser, Yacine [1 ,2 ]
Gaber, Chrystel [1 ]
Wary, Jean-Philippe [1 ]
Bouzefrane, Samia [2 ]
Yacoub, Meziane [2 ]
Kalinagac, Onur [3 ]
Gur, Gurkan [3 ]
机构
[1] Orange, F-92320 Chatillon, France
[2] Cnam, CEDRIC Lab, F-75003 Paris, France
[3] Zurich Univ Appl Sci ZHAW, Inst Comp Sci, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Microservice architectures; Measurement; Service level agreements; Computer architecture; Vectors; Market research; Monitoring; Liability; trust; microservices; machine learning (ML); service level agreement (SLA);
D O I
10.1109/TNSM.2024.3417934
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Microservices architecture has become an increasingly common approach for building complex software systems. With the distributed nature of microservices, multiple actors can contribute to a service, hence affecting the dynamics of the environment and making the management of liabilities and trust more challenging. Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) are critical in that regard and any SLA violation or breach can result in significant financial damages. One major challenge is the lack of indicators to handle the liability and trust in such architectures. To address this issue, in this paper we propose a liability and trust analysis framework, namely the LASM Analysis Service (LAS), for multi-actor dynamic microservices that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 71
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Racial bias as a multi-stage, multi-actor problem: An analysis of pretrial detention
    Grossman, Joshua
    Nyarko, Julian
    Goel, Sharad
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2023, 20 (01) : 86 - 133
  • [32] Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty
    Baudry, Gino
    Macharis, Cathy
    Vallee, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 264 (01) : 257 - 269
  • [33] MOMA: Multi-Object Multi-Actor Activity Parsing
    Luo, Zelun
    Xie, Wanze
    Kapoor, Siddharth
    Liang, Yiyun
    Cooper, Michael
    Niebles, Juan Carlos
    Adeli, Ehsan
    Li Fei-Fei
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [34] A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: The case of Belgium
    Turcksin, Laurence
    Macharis, Cathy
    Lebeau, Kenneth
    Boureima, Faycal
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Bram, Svend
    De Ruyck, Jacques
    Mertens, Lara
    Jossart, Jean-Marc
    Gorissen, Leen
    Pelkmans, Luc
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (01) : 200 - 214
  • [35] Exploring multi-actor value creation in IT service processes
    Lempinen, Heikki
    Rajala, Risto
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 29 (02) : 170 - 185
  • [36] Transitions of power in multi-actor information system projects
    Kromidha, Endrit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (08) : 1587 - 1596
  • [37] A Framework of Collaborative Multi-actor Approach Based Digital Agriculture as a Solution for the Farm to Fork Strategy
    Barata, Jose
    Jassbi, Javad
    Nikghadam-Hojjati, Sanaz
    COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN DIGITALIZATION AND SOCIETY 5.0, PRO-VE 2022, 2022, 662 : 503 - 518
  • [38] Quantitative problem structuring methods for multi-actor problems: an analysis of reported applications
    van der Lei, T. E.
    Thissen, W. A. H.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2009, 60 (09) : 1198 - 1206
  • [39] Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis
    Kauffeld-Monz, Martina
    Fritsch, Michael
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2013, 47 (05) : 669 - 685
  • [40] Improving policy support in city logistics: The contributions of a multi-actor multi-criteria analysis
    Lebeau, Philippe
    Macharis, Cathy
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Janjevic, Milena
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 6 (04) : 554 - 563