Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:0
作者
Kaiser, Adergicia V. [1 ]
Zanolin-Purin, Daniela [1 ]
Chuck, Natalie [2 ,3 ]
Enaux, Jennifer [1 ]
Wruk, Daniela [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Private Univ Principal Liechtenstein UFL, Fac Med Sci, Triesen 9495, Liechtenstein
[2] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, St Gallen Radiol Network, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Grabs Hosp, St Gallen Radiol Network, CH-9472 Grabs, Switzerland
关键词
breast density assessment; breast density distribution; deep convolutional neural network; prevalence of dense breasts; Swiss population; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; 5TH EDITION; RADIOLOGISTS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14192212
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer and can reduce the sensitivity of mammography. Given the influence of breast density on patient risk stratification and screening accuracy, it is crucial to monitor the prevalence of extremely dense breasts within local populations. Moreover, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding breast density prevalence in Switzerland. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of breast density in a selected Swiss population. Methods: To overcome the potential variability in breast density classifications by human readers, this study utilized commercially available deep convolutional neural network breast classification software. A retrospective analysis of mammographic images of women aged 40 years and older was performed. Results: A total of 4698 mammograms from women (58 +/- 11 years) were included in this study. The highest prevalence of breast density was in category C (heterogeneously dense), which was observed in 41.5% of the cases. This was followed by category B (scattered areas of fibroglandular tissue), which accounted for 22.5%. Conclusions: Notably, extremely dense breasts (category D) were significantly more common in younger women, with a prevalence of 34%. However, this rate dropped sharply to less than 10% in women over 55 years of age.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [11] Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: State of the Art and Recent Advancements in Early 2024
    Carriero, Alessandro
    Groenhoff, Leon
    Vologina, Elizaveta
    Basile, Paola
    Albera, Marco
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (08)
  • [12] Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network
    Ciritsis, Alexander
    Rossi, Cristina
    de Martini, Ilaria Vittoria
    Eberhard, Matthias
    Marcon, Magda
    Becker, Anton S.
    Berger, Nicole
    Boss, Andreas
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 92 (1093)
  • [13] Population-Attributable Risk Proportion of Clinical Risk Factors for Breast Cancer
    Engmann, Natalie J.
    Golmakani, Marzieh K.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (09) : 1228 - 1236
  • [14] Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (05) : 481 - 489
  • [15] Comparison of breast density assessments according to BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions and experience level
    Gemici, Aysegul Akdogan
    Bayram, Ersoy
    Hocaoglu, Elif
    Inci, Ercan
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2020, 9 (07)
  • [16] Breast cancer detection using enhanced IRI-numerical engine and inverse heat transfer modeling: model description and clinical validation
    Gutierrez, Carlos
    Owens, Alyssa
    Medeiros, Lori
    Dabydeen, Donnette
    Sritharan, Nithya
    Phatak, Pradyumna
    Kandlikar, Satish G.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [17] Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening
    Holland, Katharina
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Mann, Ritse M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [18] To what extent are objectively measured mammographic imaging techniques associated with compression outcomes
    Hudson, Sue M.
    Wilkinson, Louise S.
    de Stavola, Bianca L.
    Dos-santos-silva, Isabel
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1146)
  • [19] Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hussein, Heba
    Abbas, Engy
    Keshavarzi, Sareh
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Bukhanov, Karina
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    Au, Frederick
    Ghai, Sandeep
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    Freitas, Vivianne
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (03)
  • [20] Changes in Breast Density Reporting Patterns of Radiologists After Publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS Guidelines: A Single Institution Experience
    Irshad, Abid
    Leddy, Rebecca
    Lewis, Madelene
    Cluver, Abbie
    Ackerman, Susan
    Pavic, Dag
    Collins, Heather
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (04) : 943 - 948