Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:0
作者
Kaiser, Adergicia V. [1 ]
Zanolin-Purin, Daniela [1 ]
Chuck, Natalie [2 ,3 ]
Enaux, Jennifer [1 ]
Wruk, Daniela [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Private Univ Principal Liechtenstein UFL, Fac Med Sci, Triesen 9495, Liechtenstein
[2] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, St Gallen Radiol Network, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Grabs Hosp, St Gallen Radiol Network, CH-9472 Grabs, Switzerland
关键词
breast density assessment; breast density distribution; deep convolutional neural network; prevalence of dense breasts; Swiss population; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; 5TH EDITION; RADIOLOGISTS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14192212
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer and can reduce the sensitivity of mammography. Given the influence of breast density on patient risk stratification and screening accuracy, it is crucial to monitor the prevalence of extremely dense breasts within local populations. Moreover, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding breast density prevalence in Switzerland. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of breast density in a selected Swiss population. Methods: To overcome the potential variability in breast density classifications by human readers, this study utilized commercially available deep convolutional neural network breast classification software. A retrospective analysis of mammographic images of women aged 40 years and older was performed. Results: A total of 4698 mammograms from women (58 +/- 11 years) were included in this study. The highest prevalence of breast density was in category C (heterogeneously dense), which was observed in 41.5% of the cases. This was followed by category B (scattered areas of fibroglandular tissue), which accounted for 22.5%. Conclusions: Notably, extremely dense breasts (category D) were significantly more common in younger women, with a prevalence of 34%. However, this rate dropped sharply to less than 10% in women over 55 years of age.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications
    Abdelhafiz, Dina
    Yang, Clifford
    Ammar, Reda
    Nabavi, Sheida
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 20 (Suppl 11)
  • [2] Relationship between Volpara Density Grade and Compressed Breast Thickness in Japanese Patients with Breast Cancer
    Adachi, Mio
    Ishiba, Toshiyuki
    Maruya, Sakiko
    Hayashi, Kumiko
    Kumaki, Yuichi
    Oda, Goshi
    Aruga, Tomoyuki
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (15)
  • [3] Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature
    Anandarajah, Akila
    Chen, Yongzhen
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Hardi, Angela
    Stoll, Carolyn
    Jiang, Shu
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [4] Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study
    Banks, E
    Reeves, G
    Beral, V
    Bull, D
    Crossley, B
    Simmonds, M
    Hilton, E
    Bailey, S
    Barrett, N
    Briers, P
    English, R
    Jackson, A
    Kutt, E
    Lavelle, J
    Rockall, L
    Wallis, MG
    Wilson, M
    Patnick, J
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7464): : 477 - 479
  • [5] Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bodewes, F. T. H.
    van Asselt, A. A.
    Dorrius, M. D.
    Greuter, M. J. W.
    de Bock, G. H.
    [J]. BREAST, 2022, 66 : 62 - 68
  • [6] Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
    Boyd, Norman F.
    Guo, Helen
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Sun, Limei
    Stone, Jennifer
    Fishell, Eve
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Hislop, Greg
    Chiarelli, Anna
    Minkin, Salomon
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [7] Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Ma, Lin
    Mahmoudzadeh, Amir P.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Whaley, Dana H.
    Wu, Fang Fang
    Malkov, Serghei
    Hruska, Carrie B.
    Norman, Aaron D.
    Heine, John
    Shepherd, John
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Vachon, Celine M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (03) : 710 - 719
  • [8] Bulliard J.L., 2021, SwissMoni2010-18Report_final
  • [9] Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide
    Burton, Anya
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Perez-Gomez, Beatriz
    Vachon, Celine
    Miao, Hui
    Lajous, Martin
    Lopez-Ridaura, Ruy
    Rice, Megan
    Pereira, Ana
    Luisa Garmendia, Maria
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Bertrand, Kimberly
    Kwong, Ava
    Ursin, Giske
    Lee, Eunjung
    Qureshi, Samera A.
    Ma, Huiyan
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Moss, Sue
    Allen, Steve
    Ndumia, Rose
    Vinayak, Sudhir
    Teo, Soo-Hwang
    Mariapun, Shivaani
    Fadzli, Farhana
    Peplonska, Beata
    Bukowska, Agnieszka
    Nagata, Chisato
    Stone, Jennifer
    Hopper, John
    Giles, Graham
    Ozmen, Vahit
    Aribal, Mustafa Erkin
    Schuz, Joachim
    Van Gils, Carla H.
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Sirous, Reza
    Sirous, Mehri
    Hipwell, John
    Kim, Jisun
    Lee, Jong Won
    Dickens, Caroline
    Hartman, Mikael
    Chia, Kee-Seng
    Scott, Christopher
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Linton, Linda
    Pollan, Marina
    Flugelman, Anath Arzee
    Salem, Dorria
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (06)
  • [10] MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS
    BYRNE, C
    SCHAIRER, C
    WOLFE, J
    PAREKH, N
    SALANE, M
    BRINTON, LA
    HOOVER, R
    HAILE, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) : 1622 - 1629