Comparison of a ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray with traditional intranasal dexmedetomidine drops for sedation in preschool children: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Jin, Qi-Qi [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Wei-Cha [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Ying-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yan-Tong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Meng-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Kai-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Key Lab Pediat Anesthesiol, Key Lab Anesthesiol Zhejiang Prov,Minist Educ, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
atomization; m-YPAS; pediatric; preoperative anxiety; Ramsay sedation scale; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; EMERGENCE DELIRIUM; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2025.1528612
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the efficacy and acceptability of a ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray (DS) versus traditional drops administered by syringe (DD) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients and Methods Eighty-six preschool children were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Children were randomly assigned to receive either DS or DD. For children weighing between 10.5 and 18.5 kg, a dexmedetomidine dosage of 30 mu g (two sprays) was administered, while those weighing between 18.5 and 25.5 kg received 45 mu g (three sprays). In the DD group, dexmedetomidine was administered at a dose of 2 mu g/kg based on body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of children achieving a Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score of >= 3 within 30 min. Secondary outcomes included acceptance of intranasal medication, anxiety at parental separation and prior to induction, and compliance with induction. Results A total of 83 cases were analyzed. The proportion of children achieving an RSS score of >= 3 within 30 min was similar between the DS and DD groups (90.7% vs. 77.5%, respectively). However, the acceptance score was significantly better in the DS group (mean difference [95%]: -0.9 [-1.267 to -0.5325], P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of successful child-parent separation (88.4% vs. 85%) or satisfactory anxiolytic effect prior to induction (95.3% vs. 92.5%). Compliance with induction was comparable, with 53.5% in the DS group and 40.0% in the DD group demonstrating "optimal" compliance. Conclusion Both intranasal spray and syringe drop methods were highly effective in providing sedation and anxiolysis, but the ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray was more acceptable to children, offering a viable alternative to the syringe method. Clinical Trial Registration ChiCTR.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400089374.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops
    Li, B. L.
    Zhang, N.
    Huang, J. X.
    Qiu, Q. Q.
    Tian, H.
    Ni, J.
    Song, X. R.
    Yuen, V. M.
    Irwin, M. G.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (05) : 522 - 528
  • [2] Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Compared to a Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Ketamine for Sedation of Children Requiring Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Viana, Karolline A.
    Mendes, Fausto M.
    Mason, Keira P.
    Costa, Luciane R.
    Costa, Paulo S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (13)
  • [3] Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography studya prospective observational study
    Li, Bi L.
    Ni, Jin
    Huang, Jun X.
    Zhang, Na
    Song, Xing R.
    Yuen, Vivian M.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 25 (09) : 891 - 896
  • [4] Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine for paediatric premedication: A randomized study
    Kumari, N.
    Dubey, P. K.
    Singh, S.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2024, 71 (09): : 652 - 659
  • [5] A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine Plus Buccal Midazolam for Non-painful Procedural Sedation in Children with Autism
    Li, Bi Lian
    Yuen, Vivian Man-ying
    Zhang, Na
    Zhang, Huan Huan
    Huang, Jun Xiang
    Yang, Si Yuan
    Miller, Jeffery W.
    Song, Xing Rong
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2019, 49 (09) : 3798 - 3806
  • [6] Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Ketamine as Premedication for Level of Sedation in Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study
    Suvvari, Praneeth
    Mishra, Seema
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    Garg, Rakesh
    Bharati, Sachidanand Jee
    Gupta, Nishkarsh
    Kumar, Vinod
    Khan, M. A.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2020, 48 (03) : 215 - 222
  • [7] A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine Plus Buccal Midazolam for Non-painful Procedural Sedation in Children with Autism
    Bi Lian Li
    Vivian Man-ying Yuen
    Na Zhang
    Huan Huan Zhang
    Jun Xiang Huang
    Si Yuan Yang
    Jeffery W. Miller
    Xing Rong Song
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2019, 49 : 3798 - 3806
  • [8] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Prakhar Gyanesh
    Rudrashish Haldar
    Divya Srivastava
    Prashant Mohan Agrawal
    Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari
    P. K. Singh
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2014, 28 : 12 - 18
  • [9] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Gyanesh, Prakhar
    Haldar, Rudrashish
    Srivastava, Divya
    Agrawal, Prashant Mohan
    Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar
    Singh, P. K.
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [10] A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Combination Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sun, Mang
    Liu, Hui
    Yu, Qing
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Jing
    Lei, Yao
    Zhao, Qing-yan
    Li, Shang-yingying
    Tu, Sheng-fen
    Wei, Guang-hui
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (06) : 1550 - 1555