A Model of Trust in Online COVID-19 Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

被引:0
作者
Sillence, Elizabeth [1 ]
Branley-Bell, Dawn [1 ]
Moss, Mark [1 ]
Briggs, Pam [1 ]
机构
[1] Northumbria Univ, Dept Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, England
来源
JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY | 2025年 / 5卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
eHealth; electronic health; digital intervention; trust; online information seeking; scientific credibility; digital resources; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; respiratory; infectious; pulmonary; pandemic; public health; health information; global health; surveys; social media; DECISION-MAKING; COMMUNICATION; SEEKING;
D O I
10.2196/59317
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: During theCOVID-19 pandemic, many peoplesought information from websites and social media. Understanding the extent to which these sources were trusted is important in relation to health communication. Objective: This study aims to identify the key factors influencing UK citizens' trust and intention to act on advice about COVID-19 found via digital resources and to test whether an existing model of trust in eHealth provided a good fit for COVID-19-related information seeking online. We also wished to identify any differences between the evaluation of general information and information relating specifically to COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: In total, 525 people completed an online survey in January 2022 encompassing a general web trust questionnaire, measures of information corroboration, coping perceptions, and intention to act. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis and structural equation modeling. The evaluation responses of general information and COVID-19 vaccine information were also compared. Results: The principal component analysis revealed 5 trust factors: (1) credibility and impartiality, (2) familiarity, (3) privacy, (4) usability, and (5) personal experiences. In the final structural equation modeling model, trust had a significant direct effect on intention to act (beta=.65; P<.001). Of the trust factors, credibility and impartiality had a significant positive direct effect on trust (beta=.82; P<.001). People searching for vaccination information felt less at risk, less anxious, and more optimistic after reading the information. We noted that most people sought information from "official" sources. Finally, in the context of COVID-19, "credibility and impartiality" remain a key predictor of trust in eHealth resources, but in comparison with previous models of trust in online health information, checking and corroborating information did not form a significant part of trust evaluations. Conclusions:In timesof uncertainty, when faced with a global emergent health concern, people place their trust in familiar websites and rely on the perceived credibility and impartiality of those digital sources above other trust factors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The Impact of Emotion and Government Trust on Individuals' Risk Information Seeking and Avoidance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-country Comparison [J].
Ahn, Jisoo ;
Kim, Hye Kyung ;
Kahlor, Lee Ann ;
Atkinson, Lucy ;
Noh, Ghee-Young .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2021, 26 (10) :728-741
[2]   Trends and Predictors of COVID-19 Information Sources and Their Relationship With Knowledge and Beliefs Related to the Pandemic: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Ali, Shahmir H. ;
Foreman, Joshua ;
Tozan, Yesim ;
Capasso, Ariadna ;
Jones, Abbey M. ;
DiClemente, Ralph J. .
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2020, 6 (04) :154-168
[3]   Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Allington, Daniel ;
McAndrew, Siobhan ;
Moxham-Hall, Vivienne ;
Duffy, Bobby .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (01) :236-247
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Coronavirus and changing attitudes towards vaccination
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PRIME MINISTERS STAT
[6]   Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review [J].
Brown, Katrina F. ;
Kroll, J. Simon ;
Hudson, Michael J. ;
Ramsay, Mary ;
Green, John ;
Long, Susannah J. ;
Vincent, Charles A. ;
Fraser, Graham ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
VACCINE, 2010, 28 (26) :4235-4248
[7]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[8]   The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study [J].
Chan, Calvin ;
Sounderajah, Viknesh ;
Daniels, Elisabeth ;
Acharya, Amish ;
Clarke, Jonathan ;
Yalamanchili, Seema ;
Normahani, Pasha ;
Markar, Sheraz ;
Ashrafian, Hutan ;
Darzi, Ara .
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (07)
[9]   Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group [J].
Coulson, Neil S. ;
Buchanan, Heather ;
Aubeeluck, Aimee .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 68 (02) :173-178
[10]   Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications [J].
Davies, Ben ;
Lalot, Fanny ;
Peitz, Linus ;
Heering, Maria S. ;
Ozkececi, Hilal ;
Babaian, Jacinta ;
Davies Hayon, Kaya ;
Broadwood, Jo ;
Abrams, Dominic .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 8 (01)