Insurance analytics: prediction, explainability, and fairness

被引:0
作者
Aas, Kjersti [1 ]
Charpentier, Arthur [2 ]
Huang, Fei [3 ]
Richman, Ronald [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Comp Ctr, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, MONTREAL, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
[4] Old Mutual Insure, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Insurance analytics; fairness; explainability;
D O I
10.1017/S1748499524000289
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The expanding application of advanced analytics in insurance has generated numerous opportunities, such as more accurate predictive modeling powered by machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) methods, the utilization of novel and unstructured datasets, and the automation of key operations. Significant advances in these areas are being made through novel applications and adaptations of predictive modeling techniques for insurance purposes, while, concurrently, rapid advances in machine learning methods are being made outside of the insurance sector. However, these innovations also bring substantial challenges, particularly around the transparency, explanation, and fairness of complex algorithmic models and the economic and societal impacts of their adoption in decision-making. As insurance is a highly regulated industry, models may be required by regulators to be explainable, in order to enable analysis of the basis for decision making. Due to the societal importance of insurance, significant attention is being paid to ensuring that insurance models do not discriminate unfairly. In this special issue, we feature papers that explore key issues in insurance analytics, focusing on prediction, explainability, and fairness.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 539
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values [J].
Aas, Kjersti ;
Jullum, Martin ;
Loland, Anders .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 298
[2]  
Avraham R., 2017, The Routledge handbook of the ethics of discrimination, P335
[3]   Melting contestation: insurance fairness and machine learning [J].
Barry, Laurence ;
Charpentier, Arthur .
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 25 (04)
[4]   Fairness and Risk: An Ethical Argument for a Group Fairness Definition Insurers Can Use [J].
Baumann J. ;
Loi M. .
Philosophy & Technology, 2023, 36 (3)
[5]   Statistical modeling: The two cultures [J].
Breiman, L .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (03) :199-215
[6]   On clustering levels of a hierarchical categorical risk factor [J].
Campo, Bavo D. C. ;
Antonio, Katrien .
ANNALS OF ACTUARIAL SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (03) :540-578
[7]  
Charpentier A., 2024, INSURANCE BIASES DIS
[8]   Model transparency and interpretability: survey and application to the insurance industry [J].
Delcaillau, Dimitri ;
Ly, Antoine ;
Papp, Alize ;
Vermet, Franck .
EUROPEAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (02) :443-484
[9]   Fairness: plurality, causality, and insurability [J].
Fahrenwaldt, Matthias ;
Furrer, Christian ;
Hiabu, Munir Eberhardt ;
Huang, Fei ;
Jorgensen, Frederik Hytting ;
Lindholm, Mathias ;
Loftus, Joshua ;
Steffensen, Mogens ;
Tsanakas, Andreas .
EUROPEAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (02) :317-328
[10]  
Frees E. W., 2023, N AM ACTUAR J, V27, P2, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10920277.2021.1951296, 10.1080/10920277.2021.1951296]