Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Salama, Vivian [1 ]
Godinich, Brandon [1 ,2 ]
Geng, Yimin [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [1 ]
Maule, Laura [1 ]
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [1 ]
He, Renjie [1 ]
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. [1 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [1 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 7007 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77532 USA
[2] Texas Tech Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, El Paso, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Cancer pain; cancer pain management; machine learning; artificial intelligence; SUPPORT COMPUTER-PROGRAM; PERSISTENT PAIN; PREDICTION MODEL; RISK; APPLICABILITY; PROBAST; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.025
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objectives. Pain is a challenging multifaceted symptom reported by most cancer patients. This systematic review aims to explore applications of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) in predicting pain-related outcomes and pain management in cancer. Methods. A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted using terms: " Cancer, " " Pain, " " Pain Management," " Analgesics, " " Arti fi cial Intelligence," " Machine Learning," and " Neural Networks" published up to September 7, 2023. AI/ML models, their validation and performance were summarized. Quality assessment was conducted using PROBAST risk-of-bias andadherence to TRIPOD guidelines. Results. Forty four studies from 2006 to 2023 were included. Nineteen studies used AI/ML for classifying pain after cancer therapy [median AUC 0.80 (range 0.76-0.94)]. Eighteen studies focused on cancer pain research [median AUC 0.86 (range 0.50-0.99)], and 7 focused on applying AI/ML for cancer pain management, [median AUC 0.71 (range 0.47-0.89)]. Median AUC (0.77) of models across all studies. Random forest models demonstrated the highest performance (median AUC 0.81), lasso models had the highest median sensitivity (1), while Support Vector Machine had the highest median specificity (0.74). Overall adherence to TRIPOD guidelines was 70.7%. Overall, high risk-of-bias (77.3%), lack of external validation (14%) and clinical application (23%) was detected. Reporting of model calibration was also missing (5%). Conclusion. Implementation of AI/ML tools promises significant advances in the classification, risk stratification, and management decisions for cancer pain. Further research focusing on quality improvement, model calibration, rigorous external clinical validation in real healthcare settings is imperative for ensuring its practical and reliable application in clinical practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024;68:e462-e490. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:e462 / e490
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting Mandibular Bone Growth Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
    Dashti, Mahmood
    Khosraviani, Farshad
    Azimi, Tara
    Sehat, Mohammad Soroush
    Alekajbaf, Ehsan
    Fahimipour, Amir
    Zare, Niusha
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING, 2024, 4 (03): : 2731 - 2745
  • [32] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Circular Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review
    Noman A.A.
    Akter U.H.
    Pranto T.H.
    Haque A.K.M.B.
    Ann. Emer. Tech. Comp., 2022, 2 (13-40): : 13 - 40
  • [33] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
    Van Booven, Derek J.
    Kuchakulla, Manish
    Pai, Raghav
    Frech, Fabio S.
    Ramasahayam, Reshna
    Reddy, Pritika
    Parmar, Madhumita
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Arora, Himanshu
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 31 - 39
  • [34] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Jin, Peng
    Ji, Xiaoyan
    Kang, Wenzhe
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Ma, Fuhai
    Ma, Shuai
    Hu, Haitao
    Li, Weikun
    Tian, Yantao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2339 - 2350
  • [35] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Peng Jin
    Xiaoyan Ji
    Wenzhe Kang
    Yang Li
    Hao Liu
    Fuhai Ma
    Shuai Ma
    Haitao Hu
    Weikun Li
    Yantao Tian
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 : 2339 - 2350
  • [36] The potential and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the study of pain
    Sarzi-Puttini, P.
    Giorgi, V.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 41 (06) : 1214 - 1215
  • [37] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiotocography: A scoping review
    Aeberhard, Jasmin L.
    Radan, Anda-Petronela
    Delgado-Gonzalo, Ricard
    Strahm, Karin Maya
    Sigurthorsdottir, Halla Bjorg
    Schneider, Sophie
    Surbek, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 281 : 54 - 62
  • [38] Introduction to artificial intelligence and machine learning into orthodontics: A review
    Kondody, Rony T.
    Patil, Aishwarya
    Devika, G.
    Jose, Angeline
    Kumar, Ashwath
    Nair, Saumya
    APOS TRENDS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 12 (03) : 214 - 220
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Marketing: A Bibliometric Review
    Kushwaha, Pooja S.
    Badhera, Usha
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 15 (05): : 55 - 66
  • [40] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Electrophysiology—a Short Review
    Shahrukh Khan
    Chanho Lim
    Humza Chaudhry
    Ala Assaf
    Eoin Donnelan
    Nassir Marrouche
    Omar Kreidieh
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2023, 25 : 443 - 460