Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review

被引:3
作者
Salama, Vivian [1 ]
Godinich, Brandon [1 ,2 ]
Geng, Yimin [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [1 ]
Maule, Laura [1 ]
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [1 ]
He, Renjie [1 ]
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. [1 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [1 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 7007 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77532 USA
[2] Texas Tech Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, El Paso, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Cancer pain; cancer pain management; machine learning; artificial intelligence; SUPPORT COMPUTER-PROGRAM; PERSISTENT PAIN; PREDICTION MODEL; RISK; APPLICABILITY; PROBAST; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.025
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objectives. Pain is a challenging multifaceted symptom reported by most cancer patients. This systematic review aims to explore applications of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) in predicting pain-related outcomes and pain management in cancer. Methods. A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted using terms: " Cancer, " " Pain, " " Pain Management," " Analgesics, " " Arti fi cial Intelligence," " Machine Learning," and " Neural Networks" published up to September 7, 2023. AI/ML models, their validation and performance were summarized. Quality assessment was conducted using PROBAST risk-of-bias andadherence to TRIPOD guidelines. Results. Forty four studies from 2006 to 2023 were included. Nineteen studies used AI/ML for classifying pain after cancer therapy [median AUC 0.80 (range 0.76-0.94)]. Eighteen studies focused on cancer pain research [median AUC 0.86 (range 0.50-0.99)], and 7 focused on applying AI/ML for cancer pain management, [median AUC 0.71 (range 0.47-0.89)]. Median AUC (0.77) of models across all studies. Random forest models demonstrated the highest performance (median AUC 0.81), lasso models had the highest median sensitivity (1), while Support Vector Machine had the highest median specificity (0.74). Overall adherence to TRIPOD guidelines was 70.7%. Overall, high risk-of-bias (77.3%), lack of external validation (14%) and clinical application (23%) was detected. Reporting of model calibration was also missing (5%). Conclusion. Implementation of AI/ML tools promises significant advances in the classification, risk stratification, and management decisions for cancer pain. Further research focusing on quality improvement, model calibration, rigorous external clinical validation in real healthcare settings is imperative for ensuring its practical and reliable application in clinical practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024;68:e462-e490. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:e462 / e490
页数:29
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
    Ahmed, Molla Imaduddin
    Spooner, Brendan
    Isherwood, John
    Lane, Mark
    Orrock, Emma
    Dennison, Ashley
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [2] Akshayaa S, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES AND COMMUNICATION (ICCMC 2019), P68, DOI [10.1109/iccmc.2019.8819666, 10.1109/ICCMC.2019.8819666]
  • [3] Clinical relevance of deep learning models in predicting the onset timing of cancer pain exacerbation
    Bang, Yeong Hak
    Choi, Yoon Ho
    Park, Mincheol
    Shin, Soo-Yong
    Kim, Seok Jin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [4] Feasibility and Prediction of Adverse Events in a Postoperative Monitoring Program of Patient-Reported Outcomes and a Wearable Device Among Gynecologic Oncology Patients
    Barber, Emma L.
    Garg, Ravi
    Strohl, Anna
    Roque, Dario
    Tanner, Edward
    [J]. JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2022, 6 (01):
  • [5] PERSONALIZED CALCULATOR FOR PREDICTION OF OPIOID-ASSOCIATED PHARMACORESISTANCE IN PATIENTS WITH PAN CREASE CANCER
    Bobrova, Olga
    Zyryanov, Sergey
    Shnayder, Natalia
    Petrova, Marina
    [J]. ARCHIV EUROMEDICA, 2020, 10 (04): : 20 - 22
  • [6] Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence-An Updated Overview
    Busnatu, Stefan
    Niculescu, Adelina-Gabriela
    Bolocan, Alexandra
    Petrescu, George E. D.
    Paduraru, Dan Nicolae
    Nastasa, Iulian
    Lupusoru, Mircea
    Geanta, Marius
    Andronic, Octavian
    Grumezescu, Alexandru Mihai
    Martins, Henrique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [7] Development of a binary classifier model from extended facial codes toward video-based pain recognition in cancer patients
    Cascella, Marco
    Vitale, Vincenzo Norman
    Mariani, Fabio
    Iuorio, Manuel
    Cutugno, Francesco
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 23 (04) : 638 - 645
  • [8] Utilizing an artificial intelligence framework (conditional generative adversarial network) to enhance telemedicine strategies for cancer pain management
    Cascella, Marco
    Scarpati, Giuliana
    Bignami, Elena Giovanna
    Cuomo, Arturo
    Vittori, Alessandro
    Di Gennaro, Piergiacomo
    Crispo, Anna
    Coluccia, Sergio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [9] Different Machine Learning Approaches for Implementing Telehealth-Based Cancer Pain Management Strategies
    Cascella, Marco
    Coluccia, Sergio
    Monaco, Federica
    Schiavo, Daniela
    Nocerino, Davide
    Grizzuti, Mariacinzia
    Romano, Maria Cristina
    Cuomo, Arturo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [10] Exploratory analysis using machine learning to predict for chest wall pain in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Chao, Hann-Hsiang
    Valdes, Gilmer
    Luna, Jose M.
    Heskel, Marina
    Berman, Abigail T.
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Simone, Charles B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 539 - 546