Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar

被引:0
作者
Bemis, Caitlin [1 ,2 ]
Konow, Nicolai [3 ]
Daley, Monica A. [2 ]
Nishikawa, Kiisa [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Dept Biol Studies, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Rat medial gastrocnemius; Mouse extensor digitorum longus; Muscle mechanics; Fascicle strain; Dynamic muscle response; Work loop; MECHANICAL POWER OUTPUT; EXTENSOR MUSCLES; SKELETAL-MUSCLES; ROUGH TERRAIN; BODY DYNAMICS; ANIMALS MOVE; LEG MUSCLES; MOUSE; MOTOR; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.248177
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Traditional work loop studies, that use sinusoidal length trajectories with constant frequencies, lack the complexities of in vivo muscle mechanics observed in modern studies. This study refines methodology of the 'avatar' method (a modified work loop) to infer in vivo muscle mechanics using ex vivo experiments with mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles. The 'avatar' method involves using EDL muscles to replicate in vivo time-varying force, as demonstrated by previous studies focusing on guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius (LG). The present study extends this method by using in vivo length trajectories and electromyographic activity from rat medial gastrocnemius (MG) during various gaits on a treadmill. Methodological enhancements from previous work, including adjusted stimulation protocols and systematic variation of starting length, improved predictions of in vivo time-varying force production (R2=0.80-0.96). The study confirms there is a significant influence of length, stimulation and their interaction on work loop variables (peak force, length at peak force, highest and average shortening velocity, and maximum and minimum active velocity), highlighting the importance of these interactions when muscles produce in vivo forces. We also investigated the limitations of traditional work loops in capturing muscle dynamics in legged locomotion (R2=0.01-0.71). While in vivo length trajectories enhanced force prediction, accurately predicting work per cycle remained challenging. Overall, the study emphasizes the utility of the 'avatar' method in elucidating dynamic muscle mechanics and highlights areas for further investigation to refine its application in understanding in vivo muscle function.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abbate F., De Ruiter C. J., Offringa C., Sargeant A. J., De Haan A., In situ rat fast skeletal muscle is more efficient at submaximal than at maximal activation levels, J. Appl. Physiol, 92, pp. 2089-2096, (2002)
  • [2] Ahn A. N., How muscles function - the work loop technique, J. Exp. Biol, 215, pp. 1051-1052, (2012)
  • [3] Ahn A. N., Full R. J., A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect, J. Exp. Biol, 205, pp. 379-389, (2002)
  • [4] Ahn A. N., Meijer K., Full R. J., In situ muscle power differs without varying in vitro mechanical properties in two insect leg muscles innervated by the same motor neuron, J. Exp. Biol, 209, pp. 3370-3382, (2006)
  • [5] Askew G. N., Marsh R. L., The effects of length trajectory on the mechanical power output of mouse skeletal muscles, J. Exp. Biol, 200, pp. 3119-3131, (1997)
  • [6] Askew G. N., Marsh R. L., Ellington C. P., The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis) during take-off, J. Exp. Biol, 204, pp. 3601-3619, (2001)
  • [7] Bemis C., Nishikawa K., ‘Avatar’, a modified ex vivo work loop experiments using in vivo strain and activation, J. Vis. Exp, 198, (2023)
  • [8] Biewener A. A., Daley M. A., Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control, J. Exp. Biol, 210, pp. 2949-2960, (2007)
  • [9] Biewener A. A., Patek S. N., Animal Locomotion, (2018)
  • [10] Blanca M. J., Alarcon R., Arnau J., Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?, Psicothema, 29, pp. 552-557, (2017)