The Domestic Acoustic Environment in Online Education-Part 1: Differences by Gender, Perceived Academic Quality, and Self-Rated Performance

被引:1
作者
Puyana-Romero, Virginia [1 ]
Diaz-Marquez, Angela Maria [2 ,3 ]
Garzon, Christiam [1 ]
Ciaburro, Giuseppe [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Amer UDLA, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Sound & Acoust Engn, Quito 170125, Ecuador
[2] Univ Las Amer UDLA, Informat Intelligence Directorate, Quito 170503, Ecuador
[3] Univ Latina Costa Rica, Res Directorate, San Jose 11501, Costa Rica
[4] Pegaso Univ, Fac Engn & Informat, I-80132 Naples, Italy
关键词
online learning; domestic soundscape; self-reported academic performance; noise sources; frequentist statistics; inference statistics; individual differences; P-VALUES; STUDENTS; NOISE; SATISFACTION; DEMOGRAPHICS; DISRUPTION; VIOLATIONS; VARIANCE; SPEECH;
D O I
10.3390/buildings15010084
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The domestic environment plays a critical role in online education, particularly its acoustic aspect. This study investigates whether there are differences in the perception of acoustic variables between students who perceive their academic performance as negative (G1) and those who rate it positively (G2). It also explores differences between students who assess the quality of education as positive or negative, along with gender distinctions. Data were collected through an online survey conducted by Universidad de Las Am & eacute;ricas, Quito, Ecuador, during the COVID-19 lockdown. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in the perception of noise between groups G1 and G2: Students who rated their academic performance negatively experienced higher noise interference from sources like voices and household appliances. Similar patterns were observed when assessing educational quality. Gender differences also emerged, with women reporting higher levels of noise interference caused by sound sources (voices, TV/Radio/household appliances, and animals), and in the development of autonomous and synchronous tasks than men. The differences between the groups evaluated in pairs suggest that these aspects should be taken into account when designing domestic spaces and strategies to improve the quality of the acoustic environment for students.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 122 条
[21]   Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales [J].
Carifio, James ;
Perla, Rocco .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (12) :1150-1152
[22]   Out of the noise: Effects of sound environment on maths performance in middle-school students [J].
Caviola, Sara ;
Visentin, Chiara ;
Borella, Erika ;
Mammarella, Irene ;
Prodi, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 73
[23]   Effects of sound-source characteristics and personal factors on the perceived controllability of indoor acoustic environments in high-rise multi-unit residences [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Kang, Jian ;
Ma, Hui .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 264
[24]   Evaluation of healthy indoor acoustic environments in residential buildings by the occupants: A mixed-method approach [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Kang, Jian ;
Ma, Hui .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 246
[25]   A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons [J].
Chen, Shi-Yi ;
Feng, Zhe ;
Yi, Xiaolian .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (06) :1725-1729
[26]   The Effect of Flipped Learning on Academic Performance as an Innovative Method for Overcoming Ebbinghau's Forgetting Curve [J].
Chun, Bo Ae ;
Heo, Hae Ja .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY (ICIET 2018), 2015, :56-60
[27]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V2nd ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[28]  
Comas-Forgas Ruben, 2021, Heliyon, V7, pe08233, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08233
[29]  
Coolican H., 2017, Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, DOI [10.4324/9780203769836, DOI 10.4324/9780203769836, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203769836]
[30]  
de Albuquerque Arajo L., 2019, Nutr Hosp, V36, P805, DOI [10.20960/nh.02481, DOI 10.20960/NH.02481]