Does mixed reality influence joint action? Impact of the mixed reality setup on users' behavior and spatial interaction

被引:0
作者
Brument, Hugo [1 ]
De Pace, Francesco [1 ]
Podkosova, Iana [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Wien, VR&AR Res Unit, Favoritenstr 11, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Collaborative Mixed Reality; Joint action; Spatial interaction; DECISION-MAKING; EMBODIMENT; AVATAR; PERCEPTION; OBSTACLES; SENSE;
D O I
10.1007/s12193-024-00445-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Understanding how people effectively perform actions together is fundamental when designing Collaborative Mixed Reality (CMR) applications. While most of the studies on CMR mostly considered either how users are immersed in the CMR (e.g., in virtual or augmented reality) or how the physical workspace is shared by users (i.e., distributed or collocated), little is known about how their combination could influence user's interaction in CMR. In this paper, we present a user study (n = 46, 23 pairs) that investigates the effect of the mixed reality setup on the user's immersion and spatial interaction during a joint-action task. Groups of two participants had to perform two types of joint actions while carrying a virtual rope to maintain a certain distance: (1) Gate, where participants had to pass through a virtual aperture together, and (2) Fruit, where participants had to use a rope to slice a virtual fruit moving in the CMR. Users were either in a distributed or collocated setup and either immersed in virtual or augmented reality. Our results showed that the immersion type and location setup altered users' proxemics as well as the users' subjective experience. In particular, we noticed better task performance when users were in augmented reality and more considerable distances between players while interacting in a distributed setup. These results contribute to the understanding of joint action in CMR and are discussed to improve the design of CMR applications.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 138
页数:20
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Babajanyan D, 2022, P ANN M COGN SCI SOC
  • [2] Biocca F., 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V3, P0, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.1997.TB00070.X, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x]
  • [3] Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action
    Bolt, Nicole K.
    Poncelet, Evan M.
    Schultz, Benjamin G.
    Loehr, Janeen D.
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2016, 46 : 173 - 187
  • [4] Boud A. C., 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210), P32, DOI 10.1109/IV.1999.781532
  • [5] The Impact of Embodiment and Avatar Sizing on Personal Space in Immersive Virtual Environments
    Buck, Lauren E.
    Chakraborty, Soumyajit
    Bodenheimer, Bobby
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2022, 28 (05) : 2102 - 2113
  • [6] Interpersonal Affordances and Social Dynamics in Collaborative Immersive Virtual Environments: Passing Together Through Apertures
    Buck, Lauren E.
    Rieser, John J.
    Narasimham, Gayathri
    Bodenheimer, Bobby
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2019, 25 (05) : 2123 - 2133
  • [7] Circumvention of Pedestrians While Walking in Virtual and Physical Environments
    Buhler, Marco A.
    Lamontagne, Anouk
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2018, 26 (09) : 1813 - 1822
  • [8] Joint action with a virtual robotic vs. human agent
    Bunlon, Frederique
    Gazeau, Jean-Pierre
    Colloud, Floren
    Marshall, Peter J.
    Bouquet, Cedric A.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 816 - 827
  • [9] Strategies used to walk through a moving aperture
    Cinelli, Michael E.
    Patla, Aftab E.
    Allard, Fran
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 27 (04) : 595 - 602
  • [10] A Comparison Between Two Different Approaches for a Collaborative Mixed-Virtual Environment in Industrial Maintenance
    De Pace, Francesco
    Manuri, Federico
    Sanna, Andrea
    Zappia, Davide
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2019, 6