An Expert Study of Systemic Influences on Progress Towards Living Wages: A Key to Unlock the Sustainable Development Goals

被引:3
作者
Barford, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Beales, Annabel [2 ]
Zorila, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Inst Sustainabil Leadership CISL, Entopia Bldg, Cambridge, England
[2] Business Fights Poverty Inst, London, England
关键词
corporate responsibility; expert insights; human rights; living wages; poverty; social justice; stakeholder engagement; systemic change; CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY; MINIMUM-WAGE; IMPLEMENTATION; ONTARIO; WORLD;
D O I
10.1002/bsd2.70048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ending poverty in all its forms everywhere is Goal 1 of the Sustainable Development Goals the widespread payment of living wages as a minimum could substantially boost progress towards this development goal and others. Living wages, typically set higher than minimum wages, pay enough for workers to meet their needs and those of their families. Without living wages many workers earn poverty wages. Recognising renewed corporate and investor interest in living wages, this paper interrogates the logics and rationalities which shape discussions on living wages, drawing upon 31 semi-structured interviews with living wage professionals. Discourse analysis is used to identify the logics and rationalities which shape organisation-level progress towards living wages. Some logics, surrounding human rights, stakeholder capitalism, sustainable development, redistribution and social justice, encourage the implementation of living wages. Other logics, including shareholder capitalism, profit and mass consumerism, create a chilling effect on the living wages movement. At present, wages are the main mechanism for distributing money, so wage levels impact people's access to services and resources. The living wages agenda is progressing rapidly, comprising a 2024 International Labour Organization meeting of experts, corporate and investor commitments, worker demands, and the growing prevalence of geographically specific living wages calculations. It is therefore crucial that the logics and narratives underpinning decisions on pay are interrogated as these play a pivotal role in progress towards human rights, social justice and the Sustainable Development Goals.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 164 条
[61]   Religions and the living wage [J].
Gardella, Peter .
FORUM FOR SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 49 (01) :3-23
[62]   ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns [J].
Gibson Brandon, Rajna ;
Krueger, Philipp ;
Schmidt, Peter Steffen .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2021, 77 (04) :104-127
[63]  
Glasmeier A.K., 2024, What Is a Living Wage and How Is It Estimated?
[64]  
Global Living Wage Coalition, 2022, What Is a Living Wage?
[65]  
Global Living Wage Coalition, 2018, Resource Library.
[66]  
Gov.uk, 2022, National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage Rates.
[67]  
Gov.uk, 2024, National Living Wage to Increase to 12.21 in April 2025: Low Pay Commission Recommendations Accepted in Full.
[68]   On the 2019 Business Roundtable "Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation" [J].
Harrison, Jeffrey S. ;
Phillips, Robert A. ;
Freeman, R. Edward .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 46 (07) :1223-1237
[69]  
Hascall S C., 2014, St. Johns Law Review, V88, P291
[70]   Hazard Pay for COVID-19? Yes, But It's Not a Substitute for a Living Wage and Enforceable Worker Protections [J].
Hecker, Steven .
NEW SOLUTIONS-A JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 30 (02) :95-101