Assessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation

被引:0
作者
Aydin, Sonay [1 ]
Durmaz, Onder [1 ]
Fatihoglu, Erdem [1 ]
Kadirhan, Ozlem [1 ]
Karavas, Erdal [2 ]
机构
[1] Erzincan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, TR-24100 Erzincan, Turkiye
[2] Bandirma 17 Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, TR-10200 Balikesir, Turkiye
关键词
Graf classification; developmental dysplasia; hip; femur; measurement; CONGENITAL DISLOCATION; ULTRASOUND; DIAGNOSIS; NEWBORN; INFANTS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14202317
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The prevalence of developmental hip dysplasia is estimated to be 0.1-2 per 1000 infants. Hip imaging by ultrasonography is considered to be the gold standard method for screening and detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as per the Graf categorization. The classification of hip differentiation into type 1 and type 2 is determined by the alpha angle, as assessed by the Graf classification. Type 1 hips are defined as those with an alpha angle exceeding 60 degrees, whilst type 2 hips are defined as those with measurements falling within the range of 50 to 59 degrees. Methods: The computerized patient card in our institution had a compilation of 208 hip photographs taken from 110 patients, with 98 of them being bilateral. The acquisition of these photos occurred from January 2020 to December 2020. A retrospective review was conducted on the ultrasound (US) scans, with a specific emphasis on the outcomes related to type 1 and type 2 hips. Results: There were 108 high-resolution US photos in the type 1 hip group and 100 high-resolution US images in the type 2 hip group. In terms of unilateral or bilateral cases, gender, or age, no statistically significant differences were seen between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FMD model exhibited a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 70% in effectively predicting the presence of type 1 mature hips when the values surpassed 2.9 mm. The AUC (area under the curve) value achieved was 0.628. Conclusions: The process of diagnostic categorization may occasionally encounter challenges in accurately differentiating between type 1 and type 2 hip separation subsequent to a hip ultrasound examination. The findings of our analysis indicate that the assessment of the FMD is a highly successful method, demonstrating both high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating between various scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP [J].
BARLOW, TG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1962, 44 (02) :292-301
[2]   Developmental dysplasia of the hip: A special pathology [J].
Chen, Jun ;
Zhang, Wen-Bing ;
He, Jin-Zhou ;
Zhang, Run ;
Cao, Yin-Qiang ;
Liu, Xing .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2018, 21 (04) :238-242
[3]   Developmental dysplasia of the hip [J].
Dezateux, Carol ;
Rosendahl, Karen .
LANCET, 2007, 369 (9572) :1541-1552
[4]  
Furkatovich S.B., 2021, World Bull. Public Health, V5, P108
[5]  
Garn S M, 1967, Med Radiogr Photogr, V43, P45
[6]   Optimizing the Time for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Screening Earlier or Later? [J].
Gokharman, Fatma Dilek ;
Aydin, Sonay ;
Fatihoglu, Erdem ;
Ergun, Elif ;
Kosar, Pinar Nercis .
ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2019, 35 (02) :130-135
[7]   Morphologic features of the acetabulum [J].
Govsa, F ;
Ozer, MA ;
Ozgur, Z .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2005, 125 (07) :453-461
[8]  
Graf R., 2006, Hip Sonography: Diagnosis and Management of Infant Hip Dysplasia
[9]  
Guille J T, 2000, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V8, P232
[10]   Early detection of developmental dysplasia of hip by ultrasound [J].
Gyurkovits, Zita ;
Sohar, Gellert ;
Baricsa, Anna ;
Nemeth, Gabor ;
Orvos, Hajnalka ;
Dubs, Beat .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 31 (03) :424-429