Combinatorial Effects of Terpene, Chenodeoxycholic Acid, and Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Common Bile Duct Stone Recurrence and Gallbladder Stone Dissolution

被引:0
作者
Sung, Min Je [1 ]
Han, Sung Yong [2 ]
Lee, Jong Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Tae In [2 ]
Kim, Dong Uk [2 ]
Kwon, Chang-Il [1 ]
Cho, Jae Hee [3 ]
Choe, Jung Wan [4 ]
Hyun, Jong Jin [4 ]
Yang, Jae Kook [5 ]
Lee, Tae Hoon [5 ]
Lee, Jungnam [6 ]
Jang, Sung Ill [3 ]
Jeong, Seok [6 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Digest Dis Ctr, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seongnam 13496, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Internal Med,Sch Med, Busan 49241, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 06273, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Ansan Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Ansan 15355, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp Cheonan, Dept Internal Med, Cheonan 31151, South Korea
[6] Inha Univ, Inha Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Incheon 22332, South Korea
关键词
choledocholithiasis; recurrence; cholelithiasis; RISK-FACTORS; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; GALLSTONE DISSOLUTION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; NATURAL-HISTORY; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PREVENTION; DIFFICULT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13237414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) plus UDCA (C&U), and terpene are widely administered to prevent common bile duct (CBD) stone recurrence and dissolve gallbladder (GB) stones. We evaluated and compared the combined effects of these agents on CBD stone recurrence and GB stone resolution. Methods: This study included patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at six referral centers, retrospectively. A total of 940 patients who underwent cholecystectomy before or after CBD stone removal by ERCP were evaluated to assess CBD stone recurrence (the CBD recurrence cohort), and 98 patients with GB stones were assessed by abdominal or endoscopic ultrasonography before and 6 months after ERCP to evaluate GB stone resolution (GB cohort). Patients were divided into no-medication, single-agent treatment (UDCA, C&U, or terpene), or dual-agent treatment (terpene plus UDCA or C&U) groups for the analysis. Results: In the CBD recurrence cohort, baseline characteristics were similar in the three groups. CBD stone recurrence rates were 41.5%, 12.7%, and 9.8% in the no-medication, single-agent, and dual-agent groups, respectively (p < 0.001), and the recurrence rate was significantly lower for those administered C&U plus terpene (5.2% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.002). In the GB cohort, baseline characteristics were also similar in the groups. GB stone resolution rates of >30% were observed in 5.3%, 14.3%, and 34.8% of patients in the no-medication, single-agent, and dual-agent groups, respectively (p = 0.028). Conclusions: C&U plus terpene was significantly more effective for preventing CBD stone recurrence and achieving GB stone resolution than no medication or single agents.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Buxbaum J.L., Fehmi S.M.A., Sultan S., Fishman D.S., Qumseya B.J., Cortessis V.K., Schilperoort H., Kysh L., Matsuoka L., Yachimski P., Et al., ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis, Gastrointest. Endosc, 89, pp. 1075-1105.e15, (2019)
  • [2] Manes G., Paspatis G., Aabakken L., Anderloni A., Arvanitakis M., Ah-Soune P., Barthet M., Domagk D., Dumonceau J.M., Gigot J.F., Et al., Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline, Endoscopy, 51, pp. 472-491, (2019)
  • [3] Collins C., Maguire D., Ireland A., Fitzgerald E., O'Sullivan G.C., A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited, Ann. Surg, 239, pp. 28-33, (2004)
  • [4] Lammert F., Gurusamy K., Ko C.W., Miquel J.F., Mendez-Sanchez N., Portincasa P., van Erpecum K.J., van Laarhoven C.J., Wang D.Q., Gallstones, Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers, 2, (2016)
  • [5] Kawai K., Akasaka Y., Murakami K., Tada M., Koli Y., Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater, Gastrointest. Endosc, 20, pp. 148-151, (1974)
  • [6] Staritz M., Ewe K., Meyer zum Buschenfelde K.H., Endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis, Endoscopy, 15, pp. 197-198, (1983)
  • [7] McAlister V.C., Davenport E., Renouf E., Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, 2007, (2007)
  • [8] Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., Haber G.B., Herman M.E., Dorsher P.J., Moore J.P., Fennerty M.B., Ryan M.E., Shaw M.J., Et al., Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, N. Engl. J. Med, 335, pp. 909-918, (1996)
  • [9] Prat F., Malak N.A., Pelletier G., Buffet C., Fritsch J., Choury A.D., Altman C., Liguory C., Etienne J.P., Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, Gastroenterology, 110, pp. 894-899, (1996)
  • [10] Hawes R.H., Cotton P.B., Vallon A.G., Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy, Gastroenterology, 98, pp. 1008-1012, (1990)