What do Iranians value most when choosing a hospital? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment

被引:0
作者
Ranjbar, Mohammad [1 ]
Bazyar, Mohammad [2 ]
Pahlevanshamsi, Fatemeh [3 ]
Angell, Blake [4 ]
Assefa, Yibeltal [5 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Hlth Policy & Management Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Yazd, Iran
[2] Ilam Univ Med Sci, Fac Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Ilam, Iran
[3] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Yazd, Iran
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Syst Sci, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 10期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER; SEEKING BEHAVIOR; PATIENT CHOICE; PREFERENCES; POLICY; CANCER; CHINA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0293241
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Individual preferences have preceded the use of health care services, and it has been affected by different hospital attributes. This study aimed to elicit the Iranians' preferences in choosing hospitals using a discrete choice experiment. Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted through face to face interviews with 301 participants. The DCE was constructed by six attributes were included based on a literature review, qualitative interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and consensus development approach: waiting time, quality of care, travel time, hospital type, provider competency, and hospital facilities. individuals' preferences for hospital attributes were analyzed using a mixed logit model, and interaction terms were used to assess preference heterogeneity among individuals with different sociodemographic characteristics. Results Participants had strong and significant preferences for care delivered in hospitals with 'full' (beta = 0.6052, p<0.001) or 'moderate' (beta = 0.5882, p<0.001) hospital equipment and with 'excellent' provider competency (beta = 0.2637, p<0.001). The estimated coefficients for the "waiting time of 120 minutes" (beta = -0.1625, p<0.001) and the "travel time of 30 minutes" (beta = -0.1157, p<0.001) were negative and significant. The results also show that the personal characteristics such as age, education level, and income significantly affected individual preferences in choosing a hospital. Conclusion Considering people's preferences can be important given the more active role of today's patients in decision-making about their treatment processes. The results of this study should be taken into consideration by health policymakers and all stakeholders to be aware of differences in preferences of people and maximize their satisfaction. In this case, it is important to continuously involve people and consider their preferences in the design, topology, construction, and equipment of hospitals.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [11] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [12] Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?A discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project
    Peter Burge
    Nancy Devlin
    John Appleby
    Charlene Rohr
    Jonathan Grant
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2004, 3 (4) : 183 - 194
  • [13] Cutler H, 2017, Assessing choice for public hospital patients
  • [14] Public Preferences and Willingness to Pay for a COVID-19 Vaccine in Iran: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Darrudi, Alireza
    Daroudi, Rajabali
    Yunesian, Masud
    Sari, Ali Akbari
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2022, 6 (05) : 669 - 679
  • [15] Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Donkers, Bas
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Stolk, Elly A.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (05) : 373 - 384
  • [16] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ryan, Mandy
    Gerard, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) : 145 - 172
  • [17] What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice
    Determann, Domino
    Lambooij, Mattijs S.
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hayen, Arthur P.
    Varkevisser, Marco
    Schut, Frederik T.
    de Wit, G. Ardine
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 165 : 10 - 18
  • [18] The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England
    Dixon, Anna
    Robertson, Ruth
    Bal, Roland
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2010, 5 (03) : 295 - 317
  • [19] Health-seeking behavior and medical facility choice in Samsun, Turkey
    Dundar, Cihad
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (09) : 1015 - 1019
  • [20] Using Conjoint Analysis to Elicit GPs' Preferences for Family Physician Contracts: A Case Study in Iran
    Ezatabadi, Mohammad Ranjbar
    Rashidian, Arash
    Shariati, Mohammad
    Foroushani, Abbas Rahimi
    Sari, Ali Akbari
    [J]. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (11)