Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Arunjaroensuk, Sirida [1 ,2 ]
Yotpibulwong, Thanida [2 ]
Fu, Po-Sung [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jen-Chyan [3 ,5 ]
Hung, Chun-Cheng [3 ,5 ]
Mattheos, Nikos [2 ,6 ]
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 34 Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Digital Implant Surg R, Fac Dent, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Dent Med, Sch Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Div Prosthodont, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS); Dynamic system; Navigation; Accuracy; Augmented reality (AR); DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; GUIDED SURGERY; PLACEMENT; TEMPLATE; TECHNOLOGY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses. Materials and methods: Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 +/- 1.01 degrees and 2.42 +/- 0.76 degrees, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 +/- 0.45 mm and 0.87 +/- 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 +/- 0.44 mm and 1.18 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2024 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery
    He, Jin
    Zhang, Qinmeng
    Wang, Xueting
    Fu, Mengdie
    Zhang, Hui
    Song, Luyao
    Pu, Rui
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Yang, Guoli
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (02) : 385 - 401
  • [32] Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer-assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials
    Siqueira, Rafael
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Galli, Matthew
    Saleh, Islam
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Chan, Hsun-Liang
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (06) : 660 - 671
  • [33] Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery in clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Zixin
    Li, An
    Unkovskiy, Alexey
    Li, Jiang
    Beuer, Florian
    Wu, Zhe
    Li, Ping
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [34] Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study
    Yuzhang Feng
    Zhenya Su
    Anchun Mo
    Xingmei Yang
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8
  • [35] Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study
    Feng, Yuzhang
    Su, Zhenya
    Mo, Anchun
    Yang, Xingmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [36] A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional And Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 2: Patient Related Outcome Measures
    Sancho-Puchades, Manuel
    Hernandez Alfaro, Federico
    Naenni, Nadja
    Jung, Ronald
    Haemmerle, Christoph
    Schneider, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 39 (04) : E99 - E110
  • [37] In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy Analysis of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in an Edentulous Patient
    Makarov, Nikolay
    Papi, Piero
    Santomauro, Vincenzo
    Di Carlo, Gabriele
    Polimeni, Antonella
    Di Murro, Bianca
    Saccucci, Matteo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [38] Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study
    Cassetta, M.
    Altieri, F.
    Giansanti, M.
    Bellardini, M.
    Brandetti, G.
    Piccoli, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (10) : 1335 - 1342
  • [39] Clinical and in vitro application of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: a scoping review
    Zhou, W. K.
    Wang, J. J.
    Jiang, Y. H.
    Yang, L.
    Luo, Y. L.
    Man, Y.
    Wang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 54 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [40] The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series
    Wang, Jiayi
    Ge, Yanjun
    Muhlemann, Sven
    Pan, Shaoxia
    Jung, Ronald E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (11) : 1278 - 1288