Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Arunjaroensuk, Sirida [1 ,2 ]
Yotpibulwong, Thanida [2 ]
Fu, Po-Sung [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jen-Chyan [3 ,5 ]
Hung, Chun-Cheng [3 ,5 ]
Mattheos, Nikos [2 ,6 ]
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 34 Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Digital Implant Surg R, Fac Dent, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Dent Med, Sch Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Div Prosthodont, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS); Dynamic system; Navigation; Accuracy; Augmented reality (AR); DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; GUIDED SURGERY; PLACEMENT; TEMPLATE; TECHNOLOGY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses. Materials and methods: Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 +/- 1.01 degrees and 2.42 +/- 0.76 degrees, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 +/- 0.45 mm and 0.87 +/- 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 +/- 0.44 mm and 1.18 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2024 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery
    El Kholy, Karim
    Lazarin, Rafael
    Janner, Simone F. M.
    Faerber, Karin
    Buser, Ramona
    Buser, Daniel
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (11) : 1067 - 1075
  • [22] Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study
    Li, Ping
    Zhao, Chunhui
    Chen, Jiahao
    Xu, Shulan
    Yang, Shuo
    Li, An
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (06) : 1279 - 1288
  • [23] The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement With Different Methods of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
    Mahardawi, Basel
    Jiaranuchart, Sirimanas
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Dhanesuan, Kanit
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [24] Computer guided versus freehand dental implant surgery: Randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mahmoud, Nermine Ramadan
    Eldin, Mohamed Hatem Kamal
    Diab, Mai Hassan
    Mahmoud, Omar Samy
    Fekry, Yasser El-Sayed
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (11) : 1472 - 1476
  • [25] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [26] Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery in clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zixin Luo
    An Li
    Alexey Unkovskiy
    Jiang Li
    Florian Beuer
    Zhe Wu
    Ping Li
    BMC Oral Health, 25 (1)
  • [27] Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study
    Kivovics, Marton
    Takacs, Anna
    Penzes, Dorottya
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
  • [28] Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study
    Li, Jun
    Dai, Meng
    Wang, Siwei
    Zhang, Xitao
    Fan, Qin
    Chen, Lin
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 148
  • [29] Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study
    Feng, Yuzhang
    Su, Zhenya
    Mo, Anchun
    Yang, Xingmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [30] Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study
    Yuzhang Feng
    Zhenya Su
    Anchun Mo
    Xingmei Yang
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8