Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Arunjaroensuk, Sirida [1 ,2 ]
Yotpibulwong, Thanida [2 ]
Fu, Po-Sung [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jen-Chyan [3 ,5 ]
Hung, Chun-Cheng [3 ,5 ]
Mattheos, Nikos [2 ,6 ]
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 34 Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Digital Implant Surg R, Fac Dent, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Dent Med, Sch Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Div Prosthodont, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS); Dynamic system; Navigation; Accuracy; Augmented reality (AR); DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; GUIDED SURGERY; PLACEMENT; TEMPLATE; TECHNOLOGY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses. Materials and methods: Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 +/- 1.01 degrees and 2.42 +/- 0.76 degrees, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 +/- 0.45 mm and 0.87 +/- 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 +/- 0.44 mm and 1.18 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2024 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Jingxian
    Sun, Wei
    Li, Lei
    Li, Honglei
    Zou, Yujie
    Huang, Bin
    Ji, Wei
    Shi, Bin
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, : 101 - 113
  • [22] Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study
    Zhang, Sihui
    Cai, Qin
    Chen, Weiyi
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Gao, Yan
    Wu, Dong
    Chen, Jiang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 220 - 229
  • [23] Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study
    Kivovics, Marton
    Takacs, Anna
    Penzes, Dorottya
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
  • [24] Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study
    Takacs, Anna
    Marada, Gyula
    Turzo, Kinga
    Nagy, Akos
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Kivovics, Marton
    Muhl, Attila
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [25] Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study
    Li, Jun
    Dai, Meng
    Wang, Siwei
    Zhang, Xitao
    Fan, Qin
    Chen, Lin
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 148
  • [26] Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Template-Based Implant Placement Using Two Different Surgical Templates Designed with or without Metallic Sleeves: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tallarico, Marco
    Martinolli, Matteo
    Kim, Yong-Jin
    Cocchi, Fabio
    Meloni, Silvio Mario
    Alushi, Adem
    Xhanari, Erta
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (02)
  • [27] Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mai, Hang-Nga
    Dam, Van Viet
    Lee, Du-Hyeong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [28] Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study
    Sittikornpaiboon, Paknisa
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Kaboosaya, Boosana
    Subbalekha, Keskanya
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04) : 635 - 643
  • [29] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [30] Computer guided versus freehand dental implant surgery: Randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mahmoud, Nermine Ramadan
    Eldin, Mohamed Hatem Kamal
    Diab, Mai Hassan
    Mahmoud, Omar Samy
    Fekry, Yasser El-Sayed
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (11) : 1472 - 1476