共 50 条
Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial
被引:0
|作者:
Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
[1
,2
]
Yotpibulwong, Thanida
[2
]
Fu, Po-Sung
[3
,4
]
Wang, Jen-Chyan
[3
,5
]
Hung, Chun-Cheng
[3
,5
]
Mattheos, Nikos
[2
,6
]
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 34 Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Digital Implant Surg R, Fac Dent, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Dent Med, Sch Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Div Prosthodont, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词:
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS);
Dynamic system;
Navigation;
Accuracy;
Augmented reality (AR);
DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY;
NAVIGATION SYSTEM;
GUIDED SURGERY;
PLACEMENT;
TEMPLATE;
TECHNOLOGY;
EXPERIENCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses. Materials and methods: Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 +/- 1.01 degrees and 2.42 +/- 0.76 degrees, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 +/- 0.45 mm and 0.87 +/- 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 +/- 0.44 mm and 1.18 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2024 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S50
页数:7
相关论文