Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients

被引:0
|
作者
Bostanci, Coskun [1 ]
Erdem, Kazim [1 ]
机构
[1] Karabuk Training & Res Hosp, Karabuk, Turkiye
来源
CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate biopsy; prostate volume; prostate-specific antigen density; prostate cancer; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; PSA DENSITY; CANCER; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SCORE; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.17826/cumj.1446498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate-specific antigen grey zone patients with pre-biopsy negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.<br /> Materials and Methods: The study analyzed data from 227 patients with negative pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging results. The detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were calculated, and simple and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.<br /> Results: The overall prostate cancer rate was 18.9% and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was 8.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen density and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma, while age and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for clinically significant prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific antigen density with the cutoff value of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc had the highest area under curve values for clinically significant prostate carcinoma followed by prostate volume with a cutoff value of <= 46 cc.<br /> Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the cutoff value of prostate-specific antigen density of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc and prostate volume <= 46 cc might be considered for biopsy decision in grey zone patients regardless of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance results. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate health index can stratify patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging to reduce prostate biopsies
    Leung, John Shung-Lai
    Ma, Wai-Kit
    Ho, Brian Sze-Ho
    Chun, Stacia Tsun-Tsun
    Na, Rong
    Zhan, Yongle
    Ng, Chi-Yuen
    Ip, Chi-Ho
    Ng, Ada Tsui-Lin
    Lam, Yiu-Chung
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2024, 26 (01): : 20 - 24
  • [42] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Association of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Parameters with Histopathologic Findings
    Abedi, Iraj
    Tavakkoli, Mohammad Bagher
    Rabbani, Masoud
    Jabbari, Keyvan
    Sirous, Mehri
    Far, Ghasem Yadegar
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03)
  • [43] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
    POLLACK, HM
    SCHNALL, MD
    PROSTATE, 1992, : 17 - 31
  • [44] Prostate Cancer: The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Dias, Joao Lopes
    Pina, Joao Magalhaes
    Joao, Raquel
    Fialho, Joana
    Carmo, Sandra
    Leal, Cecilia
    Bilhim, Tiago
    Marques, Rui Mateus
    Pinheiro, Luis Campos
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2015, 28 (02): : 240 - 249
  • [45] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate - a basic tutorial
    Cabarrus, Miguel C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 376 - 386
  • [46] Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Group Stratification of Prostate Adenocarcinoma
    Bonebrake, Benjamin
    Parr, Elsa
    Huynh, Linda My
    Coutu, Brendan
    Hansen, Neil
    Teply, Benjamin
    Enke, Charles
    Lagrange, Chad
    Baine, Michael
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [47] Prostate Health Index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict prostate cancer grade reclassification in active surveillance
    Schwen, Zeyad R.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Carter, Herbert Ballentine
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (03) : 373 - 378
  • [48] Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS)
    Faria, Rita
    Soares, Marta O.
    Spackman, Eldon
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Kaplan, Richard
    Emberton, Mark
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [49] Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies
    Knaapila, Juha
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ettala, Otto
    Taimen, Pekka
    Verho, Janne
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Kiviniemi, Aida
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Merisaari, Harri
    Lamminen, Tarja
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (03): : 522 - 531
  • [50] Impact of post prostate biopsy hemorrhage on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Sharif-Afshar, Ali-Reza
    Fen, Tom
    Koopman, Steven
    Christopher Nguyen
    Li, Quanlin
    Shkolyar, Eugene
    Saouaf, Rola
    Kim, Hyung L.
    Canadian Journal of Urology, 2015, 22 (02) : 7698 - 7702