Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients

被引:0
|
作者
Bostanci, Coskun [1 ]
Erdem, Kazim [1 ]
机构
[1] Karabuk Training & Res Hosp, Karabuk, Turkiye
来源
CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate biopsy; prostate volume; prostate-specific antigen density; prostate cancer; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; PSA DENSITY; CANCER; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SCORE; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.17826/cumj.1446498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate-specific antigen grey zone patients with pre-biopsy negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.<br /> Materials and Methods: The study analyzed data from 227 patients with negative pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging results. The detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were calculated, and simple and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.<br /> Results: The overall prostate cancer rate was 18.9% and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was 8.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen density and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma, while age and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for clinically significant prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific antigen density with the cutoff value of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc had the highest area under curve values for clinically significant prostate carcinoma followed by prostate volume with a cutoff value of <= 46 cc.<br /> Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the cutoff value of prostate-specific antigen density of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc and prostate volume <= 46 cc might be considered for biopsy decision in grey zone patients regardless of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance results. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Glass, Allison S.
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (05) : 730 - 737
  • [32] The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Koo, Brendan
    Doble, Andrew
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Warren, Anne
    Kastner, Christof
    Bratt, Ola
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (05) : 724 - 730
  • [33] Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences
    Maximilian Haack
    Vanessa Miksch
    Zhe Tian
    Gregor Duwe
    Anita Thomas
    Angelika Borkowetz
    Kristina Stroh
    Christian Thomas
    Axel Haferkamp
    Thomas Höfner
    Katharina Boehm
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2947 - 2954
  • [34] The Importance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Suer, Evren
    Ozden, Eriz
    Akinci, Aykut
    Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
    Telli, Onur
    Gulpinar, Omer
    Gogus, Cagatay
    Turkolmez, Kadir
    Baltaci, Sumer
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2016, 15 (01): : 4 - 7
  • [35] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    Knezevic, Matej
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Culo, Karolina Bolanca
    Novosel, Luka
    Nikles, Sven
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Justinic, Danijel
    Nincevic, Josip
    Pirsa, Matea
    Ruzic, Boris
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 : 35 - 39
  • [36] Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results
    Wysock, James S.
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Bjurlin, Marc
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (04) : 515 - 520
  • [37] Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study
    Lo, Glen
    Burton, Kirsteen R.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Fleshner, Neil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Ghai, Sangeet
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (06): : 1159 - 1164
  • [38] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer
    Counago, Felipe
    Diaz Gavela, Ana Aurora
    Sancho, Gemma
    Ortiz, Irene
    Jose Marcos, Francisco
    Recio, Manuel
    Fernandez, Julio
    Cano, Raquel
    Jimenez, Mar
    Thuissard, Israel J.
    Sanz-Rosa, David
    Castro Novais, Juan
    Pardo, Eduardo
    Molina, Yolanda
    Perez Garcia, Hugo
    del Cerro, Elia
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2019, 24 (05) : 472 - 480
  • [39] Conspicuity of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A cross-disciplinary translational hypothesis
    Norris, Joseph M.
    Simpson, Benjamin S.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Emberton, Mark
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (11): : 14150 - 14159
  • [40] Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study
    Massanova, Matteo
    Vere, Rebecca
    Robertson, Sophie
    Crocetto, Felice
    Barone, Biagio
    Dutto, Lorenzo
    Ahmad, Imran
    Underwood, Mark
    Salmond, Jonathan
    Patel, Amit
    Celentano, Giuseppe
    Bhatt, Jaimin R.
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2023, 17 (03) : 147 - 152