Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients

被引:0
|
作者
Bostanci, Coskun [1 ]
Erdem, Kazim [1 ]
机构
[1] Karabuk Training & Res Hosp, Karabuk, Turkiye
来源
CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate biopsy; prostate volume; prostate-specific antigen density; prostate cancer; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; PSA DENSITY; CANCER; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SCORE; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.17826/cumj.1446498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate-specific antigen grey zone patients with pre-biopsy negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.<br /> Materials and Methods: The study analyzed data from 227 patients with negative pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging results. The detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were calculated, and simple and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.<br /> Results: The overall prostate cancer rate was 18.9% and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was 8.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen density and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma, while age and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for clinically significant prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific antigen density with the cutoff value of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc had the highest area under curve values for clinically significant prostate carcinoma followed by prostate volume with a cutoff value of <= 46 cc.<br /> Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the cutoff value of prostate-specific antigen density of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc and prostate volume <= 46 cc might be considered for biopsy decision in grey zone patients regardless of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance results. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Prostate Specific Antigen Density Combined with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Triage for Prostate Biopsy
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Adamcova, Vanda
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Minarik, Ivo
    Pavlicko, Adam
    Votrubova, Jana
    Babjuk, Marek
    Zachoval, Roman
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [22] Multivariable Models Incorporating Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Efficiently Predict Results of Prostate Biopsy and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsy
    Yu, Shuanbao
    Hong, Guodong
    Tao, Jin
    Shen, Yan
    Liu, Junxiao
    Dong, Biao
    Fan, Yafeng
    Li, Ziyao
    Zhu, Ali
    Zhang, Xuepei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [23] Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Ren
    Zhang, Tingting
    Zhang, Xiangmin
    Wan, Yonglin
    Fu, Xiaohong
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (12) : 1473 - 1483
  • [24] Diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Soligo, Matteo
    Mancini, Mariangela
    Leone, Nicolo
    Zecchini, Giovanni
    Reitano, Giuseppe
    Bednarova, Iliana
    Lacognata, Carmelo Salvino
    Lauro, Alberto
    Zanovello, Nicola
    Novara, Giacomo
    dal Moro, Fabrizio
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 75 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [25] Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Omer, Altan
    Harriss, Eli
    Davies, Lucy
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Punwani, Shonit
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    Van Den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Eddy, Ben A.
    Gleeson, Fergus
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 402 - 414
  • [26] Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naive Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Barone, Biagio
    Napolitano, Luigi
    Calace, Francesco Paolo
    Del Biondo, Dario
    Napodano, Giorgio
    Grillo, Marco
    Reccia, Pasquale
    De Luca, Luigi
    Prezioso, Domenico
    Muto, Matteo
    Crocetto, Felice
    Ferro, Matteo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [27] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77
  • [28] Update on Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Ahmad, Rosemina
    Rajesh, Arumugam
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 206 - 212
  • [29] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Hung, Siu-Wan
    Lin, Yen-Ting
    Liu, Ming-Cheng
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (06) : 266 - 276
  • [30] Cost consideration in utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Hutchinson, Ryan
    Lotan, Yair
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 345 - 354