Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients

被引:0
|
作者
Bostanci, Coskun [1 ]
Erdem, Kazim [1 ]
机构
[1] Karabuk Training & Res Hosp, Karabuk, Turkiye
来源
CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate biopsy; prostate volume; prostate-specific antigen density; prostate cancer; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; PSA DENSITY; CANCER; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SCORE; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.17826/cumj.1446498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate-specific antigen grey zone patients with pre-biopsy negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.<br /> Materials and Methods: The study analyzed data from 227 patients with negative pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging results. The detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were calculated, and simple and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.<br /> Results: The overall prostate cancer rate was 18.9% and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was 8.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen density and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma, while age and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for clinically significant prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific antigen density with the cutoff value of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc had the highest area under curve values for clinically significant prostate carcinoma followed by prostate volume with a cutoff value of <= 46 cc.<br /> Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the cutoff value of prostate-specific antigen density of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc and prostate volume <= 46 cc might be considered for biopsy decision in grey zone patients regardless of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance results. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results with Classical Parameters for Prostate Carcinoma in Gray Zone Patients
    Bostanci, Coskun
    Demir, Demirhan Orsan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2024, 11 (02): : 58 - 66
  • [2] Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Barchetti, Giovanni
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Del Monte, Maurizio
    Ciardi, Antonio
    Grompone, Marcello Domenico
    Campa, Riccardo
    Indino, Elena Lucia
    Barchetti, Flavio
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Gallucci, Michele
    Catalano, Carlo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [3] The effect of the combination of prostate-specific antigen derivatives with multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging scores on the negative predictive value of it in grey zone patients
    Bostanci, C.
    Demir, D. O.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2024, 48 (03): : 238 - 245
  • [4] Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences
    Haack, Maximilian
    Miksch, Vanessa
    Tian, Zhe
    Duwe, Gregor
    Thomas, Anita
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Stroh, Kristina
    Thomas, Christian
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Hoefner, Thomas
    Boehm, Katharina
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 2947 - 2954
  • [5] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    An, Julie Y.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Ismail Baris
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (05) : 388 - 396
  • [6] Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Rico, Luis
    Contreras, Pablo
    Vitagliano, Gonzalo
    Pita, Hernando Rios
    Ameri, Carlos
    Blas, Leandro
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (05): : 367 - 372
  • [7] Pitfalls in interpreting positive and negative predictive values: Application to prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Rouviere, O.
    Souchon, R.
    Melodelima, C.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 99 (09) : 515 - 518
  • [8] Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
    Anacleto, Sara Teixeira
    Alberto, Joana Neves
    Dias, Emanuel Carvalho
    Passos, Pedro Sousa
    Alves, Mario Cerqueira
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 94 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [9] Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Using Clinical Parameters to Predict Negative and Indeterminate Findings
    Deniffel, Dominik
    Zhang, Yucheng
    Salinas, Emmanuel
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    Khalvati, Farzad
    Haider, Masoom A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (02): : 292 - 298
  • [10] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: Lights and shadows
    Santoro, Agostino Antonio
    Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
    Racioppi, Marco
    Pinto, Francesco
    Palermo, Giuseppe
    Sacco, Emilio
    Campetella, Marco
    Scarciglia, Eros
    Bientinesi, Riccardo
    Di Paola, Valerio
    Totaro, Angelo
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2021, 88 (04) : 280 - 286