User Experience Study of the Patient Monitoring Systems Based on Usability Testing and Eye Tracking

被引:0
作者
Choi, Hyeonkyeong [1 ]
Jang, Wonseuk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Device Engn & Management, Seoul 06229, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Coll Med, Med Device Usabil Res Ctr, Seoul 06230, South Korea
关键词
patient monitoring system; usability; Health-ITUES; SUS; eye tracking; INTERFACE; EVALUATE;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12242573
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objectives: The patient monitoring system is a critical tool commonly used in hospitals, making it essential to assess caregivers' user requirements and satisfaction with its usability. In intensive care units (ICUs), the usability of these systems is closely linked to the work efficiency of key users, such as nurses, and directly impacts patient safety and treatment outcomes. This study evaluates the usability of patient monitoring systems in intensive care units (ICUs), focusing on user requirements and satisfaction among nurses, the primary users. Usability is directly linked to work efficiency and patient safety, with post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data from overseas, highlighting issues such as unrecognized alarms, leading to worsened patient conditions. Methods: This study involved 22 ICU nurses who had used the system for over a year, assessing usability through testing, satisfaction surveys, the Health-ITUES, and eye-tracking analysis. Results: The results showed a high success rate (94%) and positive satisfaction scores (4.15, SD = 0.88), with a Health-ITUES score of 4.13 (SD = 0.78). Eye tracking revealed that some functions, including alarms, were overlooked or not recognized. Conclusions: Recommendations include improving the interface for alarm messages and recording deletion functions to enhance user satisfaction and patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Novel Interface Designs for Patient Monitoring Applications in Critical Care Medicine: Human Factors Review
    Andrade, Evismar
    Quinlan, Leo
    Harte, Richard
    Byrne, Dara
    Fallon, Enda
    Kelly, Martina
    Casey, Siobhan
    Kirrane, Frank
    O'Connor, Paul
    O'Hora, Denis
    Scully, Michael
    Laffey, John
    Pladys, Patrick
    Beuchee, Alain
    OLaighin, Gearoid
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 7 (03):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Medical Electrical Equipment, Part, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Medical DevicesPart 2: Guidance on the Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, 623661 ISOIEC
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems - Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption
    Baig, Mirza Mansoor
    GholamHosseini, Hamid
    Moqeem, AasiaA.
    Mirza, Farhaan
    Linden, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 41 (07)
  • [6] Eye tracking metrics of orthopedic surgeons with different competency levels who practice simulation-based hip arthroscopic procedures
    Cai, Bohong
    Xu, Na
    Duan, Shengfeng
    Yi, Jiahui
    Bay, Boon Huat
    Shen, Fangyuan
    Hu, Ning
    Zhang, Peng
    Chen, Jie
    Chen, Cheng
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (12)
  • [7] Effect of Prior Health Knowledge on the Usability of Two Home Medical Devices: Usability Study
    Chaniaud, Noemie
    Metayer, Natacha
    Megalakaki, Olga
    Loup-Escande, Emilie
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (09):
  • [8] Exploring the Social Environment with the Eyes: A Review of the Impact of Facial Stimuli on Saccadic Trajectories
    Dalmaso, Mario
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [9] FDA, 2022, Content of Human Factors Information in Medical Device Marketing Submissions
  • [10] Human factors approach to evaluate the user interface of physiologic monitoring
    Fidler, Richard
    Bond, Raymond
    Finlay, Dewar
    Guldenring, Daniel
    Gallagher, Anthony
    Pelter, Michele
    Drew, Barbara
    Hu, Xiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (06) : 982 - 987