Surgical Approach and Length of Stay in Octogenarians Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy

被引:1
作者
Leonard, Grey [1 ]
Solsky, Ian [1 ]
Clark, Clancy [1 ]
Shen, Perry [1 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist Med Ctr, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
length of stay; octogenarians; pancreatectomy; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27816
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pancreatic surgery often has a lengthy recovery in the elderly. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can decrease length of stay (LOS), but it is unknown if this benefit applies to octogenarians (Age > 79). Methods: The NSQIP database was used to determine if MIS approaches were associated with reduced LOS among octogenarians undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) or distal pancreatectomy (Distal). Operative approaches were classified as "Open" or "MIS" and propensity score (PS) matching was performed. Results: For the Whipple, 1665 Open and 101 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 9, 8 days, p = 0.584). For Distal, 472 Open and 223 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 6, 5 days, p < 0.01). After PS matching, there were 202 Whipple (101 per group) and 446 Distal (223 per group) patients. There was no difference in LOS by approach in the Whipple group (p = 0.546). The median LOS was 9 (IQR 7-15), Open and 8 (IQR 6-13), MIS. For Distal, there was a difference in LOS in the Open versus MIS approach (p < 0.01) and the median LOS was 6 (IQR 5-8) and 5 (IQR 4-6). Conclusions: Among octogenarians the MIS approach was associated with decreased LOS in distal pancreatectomies, but not in pancreaticoduodenectomies.
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1616
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: a matched analysis using ACS-NSQIP [J].
Adams, Alexandra M. ;
Russell, Dylan M. ;
Carpenter, Elizabeth L. ;
Nelson, Daniel W. ;
Yheulon, Christopher G. ;
Vreeland, Timothy J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (01) :617-623
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
[3]   Robotic Liver Surgery - Current Standards and Future Perspectives [J].
Becker, Felix ;
Morgul, Haluk ;
Katou, Shadi ;
Juratli, Mazen ;
Hoelzen, Jens Peter ;
Pascher, Andreas ;
Struecker, Benjamin .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2021, 59 (01) :56-62
[4]  
Brasel H. J., 2007, Archives of surgery, V142, P461
[5]   Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Where Should We Focus Our Efforts on Improving Outcomes? [J].
Brown, Erin G. ;
Yang, Anthony ;
Canter, Robert J. ;
Bold, Richard J. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (07) :694-699
[6]   Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution [J].
Buchs, Nicolas Christian ;
Addeo, Pietro ;
Bianco, Francesco Maria ;
Ayloo, Subhashini ;
Benedetti, Enrico ;
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (12) :2739-2746
[7]  
Ho D., 2022, R package version 4.3.0
[8]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy [J].
Jin, Tao ;
Altaf, Kiran ;
Xiong, Jun J. ;
Huang, Wei ;
Javed, Muhammad A. ;
Mai, Gang ;
Liu, Xu B. ;
Hu, Wei M. ;
Xia, Qing .
HPB, 2012, 14 (11) :711-724
[9]  
Korrel M, 2021, HPB, V23, P323, DOI [10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.022, 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.022HPB]
[10]   Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older [J].
Kwon, In Gyu ;
Cho, In ;
Guner, Ali ;
Kim, Hyoung-il ;
Noh, Sung Hoon ;
Hyung, Woo Jin .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (08) :2321-2330