HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization groups 2-4 breast cancers classified as positive after targeted recounts following equivocal (2+) immunohistochemistry

被引:0
作者
Wilcock, Diane [1 ]
Sirohi, Deepika [2 ]
Coleman, Joshua F. [1 ,3 ]
Adelhardt, Parisa [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Jong Taek [1 ,3 ]
Albertson, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Affolter, Kajsa [1 ,3 ]
Beech, Cameron [1 ,3 ]
Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta [1 ,3 ]
Ruano, Ana L. [1 ,3 ]
Cleary, Allison S. [1 ,3 ]
Mahlow, Jonathan [1 ,3 ]
Balatico, Michael [1 ,3 ]
Gulbahce, H. Evin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Utah Hlth, Huntsman Canc Inst, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
HER2; fluorescence in situ hybridization; group 2-4 breast cancers; AMERICAN SOCIETY; INTRATUMORAL HETEROGENEITY; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GUIDELINES; EXPERIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/ajcp/aqaf006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the correlation between the extent of (percentage of tumor cells) immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and final human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive result in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) groups 2 to 4 with equivocal (2+) IHC requiring second, blinded FISH evaluation. Methods: Breast cancer cases submitted for HER2 FISH testing with group 2 to 4 results were included. Results: Of the 2548 cases with HER2 FISH groups 2 to 4 that had HER2 IHC performed, 1104 (43.3%) (76/182 [41.8%] of group 2, 94/161 [58.4%] of group 3, 934/2205 [42.4%] of group 4) had equivocal (2+) IHC. After second blinded, IHC-guided recounts, 217 of 1104 (19.7%) (17/76 [22.4%], 75/94 [79.8%], 125/934 [13.4%] of FISH groups 2, 3, 4 with IHC 2+, respectively) had final HER2-positive status. Only 13 of 217 (6%) of the cases with HER2-positive status had more than 50% circumferential staining of the tumor targeted for rescoring. Conclusions: In over 90% of HER2 FISH group 2 to 4 breast cancers with equivocal (2+) IHC followed by targeted, blinded second FISH evaluation and final HER2-positive result, the amplified population of tumor cells was limited (<50%). Current guidelines recommend cancers having 10% to 50% of the subpopulation with amplified cells classified as having genetic heterogeneity (GH), which have a poor response to targeted therapies. Identifying these tumors as having GH and/or repeat testing may be recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 846
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Automated Silver-enhanced In Situ Hybridization for Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparison with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry [J].
Sung, Woo Jung ;
Park, Seok Ju ;
Gu, Mi Jin ;
Bae, Young Kyung .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2010, 44 (01) :28-34
[22]   Performance of Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization on Testing HER2 Status in Breast Carcinomas With Chromosome 17 Polysomy and Equivocal (2+) HercepTest Results [J].
Gong, Yun ;
Sweet, William ;
Duh, Yi-Jing ;
Greenfield, Larry ;
Tarco, Emily ;
Trivedi, Smita ;
Symmans, W. Fraser ;
Isola, Jorma ;
Sneige, Nour .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 132 (02) :228-236
[23]   Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines [J].
Nagarjun, B. R. ;
Parikh, Biren ;
Patel, Manaswi Nareshkumar ;
Trivedi, Pina J. ;
Patel, Dharmesh M. .
SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 11 (04) :281-286
[24]   The relation between percentage of immunostained cells and amplification status in breast cancers with equivocal result for Her2 immunohistochemistry [J].
Onguru, Onder ;
Zhang, Paul J. .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 212 (05) :381-384
[25]   HER2 status in invasive breast cancer: Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization and chromogenic in-situ hybridization [J].
Shirsat, Hemlata S. ;
Epari, Sridhar ;
Shet, Tanuja ;
Bagal, Rajani ;
Hawaldar, Rohini ;
Desai, Sangeeta B. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 55 (02) :175-179
[26]   HER2 Immunohistochemistry-Guided Targeted Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis Does Not Help Identify Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer [J].
Gulbahce, H. Evin ;
Factor, Rachel ;
Geiersbach, Katherine ;
Downs-Kelly, Erinn .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (08) :741-741
[27]   HER2 Equivocal (Score=2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing? [J].
Mohanlal, Reena Dhansukh ;
Bouwer, Nikki ;
Willem, Pascale .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2023, 31 (08) :555-560
[28]   Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization [J].
Beech, Cameron ;
Wilcock, Diane M. ;
Moore, Kristina H. ;
Rowe, Leslie ;
Mahlow, Jonathan ;
Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta ;
Cleary, Allison S. ;
Lomo, Lesley ;
Ruano, Ana L. ;
Gering, Maarika ;
Bradshaw, Derek ;
Maughan, Meghan ;
Tran, Phuong ;
Davis, Richard ;
Affolter, Kajsa ;
Albertson, Daniel J. ;
Adelhardt, Parisa ;
Kim, Jongtaek ;
Coleman, Joshua F. ;
Deftereos, Georgios ;
Gulbahce, Evin H. ;
Sirohi, Deepika .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2025, 33 (02) :91-102
[29]   HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing to identify HER2-positive invasive breast cancer with negative HER2 immunohistochemistry [J].
Morsberger, Laura ;
Pallavajjala, Aparna ;
Long, Patty ;
Hardy, Melanie ;
Park, Rebecca ;
Parish, Rebecca ;
Nozari, Azin ;
Zou, Ying S. .
CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 22 (01)
[30]   HER2 Testing: How to Reach a High Concordance Rate Between Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization [J].
Khoury, Thaer ;
Kulkarni, Swati ;
Morrison, Carl ;
Bshara, Wiam ;
Zakharia, Yousef ;
Edge, Stephen .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2011, 19 (05) :424-430